In‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection

BACKGROUND: How to reduce the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), screen potential IHCA patients, and advance the treatment of IHCA are urgent problems to be solved in clinic. In this study, we tried to develop a model to predict whether patients will develop IHCA based on the data of patients who have just been admitted to hospital and evaluate the influence of different feature selection methods on machine learning (ML) models. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 25 149 patients were included in the study; 320 developed IHCA. We chose three feature selection methods (Student's t-test and Chi-square test, regression analysis and correlation analysis) and four ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression). Each ML model was trained and evaluated using raw and feature-selected data; as a result, we got 16 models. AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, recall, precision, and specificity are used to evaluate the model. The XGBoost model has the best performance with an AUROC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.984-0.988), an AUPRC of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.992, a recall of 0.695, a precision of 0.723, and a specificity of 0.996. The most significant predictors are age, albumin, sinus arrhythmia, activated partial thromboplastin time, and protein. CONCLUSIONS: Different feature selection methods have different effects on different ML models. The predictive model developed using the XGBoost algorithm is the best predictor of whether patients will develop IHCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cardiology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.70395
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection

Dinghan Hu, Junbiao Liu, Mengyuan Diao, Jiuwen Cao et al.
Clinical Cardiology
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

In‐Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection

Dinghan Hu, Junbiao Liu, Mengyuan Diao, Jiuwen Cao, Tianxin Jiang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: How to reduce the occurrence of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), screen potential IHCA patients, and advance the treatment of IHCA are urgent problems to be solved in clinic. In this study, we tried to develop a model to predict whether patients will develop IHCA based on the data of patients who have just been admitted to hospital and evaluate the influence of different feature selection methods on machine learning (ML) models. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 25 149 patients were included in the study; 320 developed IHCA. We chose three feature selection methods (Student's t-test and Chi-square test, regression analysis and correlation analysis) and four ML models (AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest, and Logistic Regression). Each ML model was trained and evaluated using raw and feature-selected data; as a result, we got 16 models. AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, recall, precision, and specificity are used to evaluate the model. The XGBoost model has the best performance with an AUROC of 0.987 (95% CI 0.984-0.988), an AUPRC of 0.763, an accuracy of 0.992, a recall of 0.695, a precision of 0.723, and a specificity of 0.996. The most significant predictors are age, albumin, sinus arrhythmia, activated partial thromboplastin time, and protein. CONCLUSIONS: Different feature selection methods have different effects on different ML models. The predictive model developed using the XGBoost algorithm is the best predictor of whether patients will develop IHCA.

Clinical CardiologyVol. 49(7)
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN), Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.