Cultural Heritage Management in Thailand:The Perspective from Regulation, Implementation, and Impediment Under Public-Private Partnership and Civil Society Participation

Following the new public management concept, public-private partnership has been instituted in the realm of public administration, transitioning the emphasis from primarily the public sector as the principal actor to encompass the private sector’s role in delivering public services. To enhance service inclusion, civil society has been incorporated as an additional social element to bolster public administration. This study aims to elucidate cultural heritage management in Thailand, focusing on regulations and action, including impediments through the public-private partnerships concept and the civil society concept. The qualitative approach included in-depth interviews and focus groups for data collection. The research revealed the absence of clear regulations or policies regarding public-private partnerships in cultural heritage management. The pertinent agency resolves this issue by instituting a novel methodology and implementing it in management by providing a Terms of Reference (TOR) and a consolidated framework of statutes, including the Cultural Heritage Act and the Public-Private Partnership Act. To enhance cultural heritage management, it is essential to implement clear, new regulations and integrate the public, private, and other sectors in management through a public-private partnership approach. Implementing the project using this strategy is essential for focusing on the benefits for investors, conservation efforts, and public engagement thereby preventing conflict and fostering understanding among all stakeholders. The public sector can no longer prioritize its interests above those of other sectors. The project contract provisions require modification and extension beyond 30 years. Although civil society is not explicitly mentioned in the laws, regulations, or policies of the cultural heritage management project, it plays a significant role during the implementation stage by participating in decision- making, empowerment, reflecting needs, negotiating, and promoting the concept of ownership, which helps reduce or solve various problems and promotes project sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia-Pacific social science review
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1612
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural Heritage Management in Thailand:The Perspective from Regulation, Implementation, and Impediment Under Public-Private Partnership and Civil Society Participation

Ratchaphon Amsuk
Asia-Pacific social science review
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Cultural Heritage Management in Thailand:The Perspective from Regulation, Implementation, and Impediment Under Public-Private Partnership and Civil Society Participation

Ratchaphon Amsuk
article en

Abstract

Following the new public management concept, public-private partnership has been instituted in the realm of public administration, transitioning the emphasis from primarily the public sector as the principal actor to encompass the private sector’s role in delivering public services. To enhance service inclusion, civil society has been incorporated as an additional social element to bolster public administration. This study aims to elucidate cultural heritage management in Thailand, focusing on regulations and action, including impediments through the public-private partnerships concept and the civil society concept. The qualitative approach included in-depth interviews and focus groups for data collection. The research revealed the absence of clear regulations or policies regarding public-private partnerships in cultural heritage management. The pertinent agency resolves this issue by instituting a novel methodology and implementing it in management by providing a Terms of Reference (TOR) and a consolidated framework of statutes, including the Cultural Heritage Act and the Public-Private Partnership Act. To enhance cultural heritage management, it is essential to implement clear, new regulations and integrate the public, private, and other sectors in management through a public-private partnership approach. Implementing the project using this strategy is essential for focusing on the benefits for investors, conservation efforts, and public engagement thereby preventing conflict and fostering understanding among all stakeholders. The public sector can no longer prioritize its interests above those of other sectors. The project contract provisions require modification and extension beyond 30 years. Although civil society is not explicitly mentioned in the laws, regulations, or policies of the cultural heritage management project, it plays a significant role during the implementation stage by participating in decision- making, empowerment, reflecting needs, negotiating, and promoting the concept of ownership, which helps reduce or solve various problems and promotes project sustainability.

Asia-Pacific social science reviewVol. 26(2)
Prince of Songkla University (TH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cultural Heritage Management in Thailand:The Perspective from Regulation, Implementation, and Impediment Under Public-Private Partnership and Civil Society Participation — Ratchaphon Amsuk · Asia-Pacific social science review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS