Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations

We develop a robust bias-corrected method of inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates (RASR) for comparing the age-standardized rate (ASR) between a subpopulation and the whole population. Unlike previous methods, the proposed approach does not rely on the proportional age-distribution (PAD) assumption, which is often unrealistic in many situations. Like an existing approach, the method corrects for bias resulting from sampling errors when using sample-based population estimates, instead of census-based populations, as the denominators for estimating ASRs. This broadens the applicability of the proposed method in studying cancer risk factors beyond the basic demographic characteristics. The robust bias-corrected estimator of the RASR and the associated variance estimator and confidence intervals are derived. We show empirically that the proposed RASR estimator performs significantly better than the existing estimator, which relies on the PAD assumption, especially when the latter assumption fails. Specifically, the proposed RASR estimator significantly reduces the bias without increasing the variance. On the other hand, when the PAD assumption holds, our RASR estimator performs similarly to the existing estimator. The proposed method has also shown highly desirable performance when at-risk population estimates used for calculating ASRs are subject to sampling errors. We also show empirically that the proposed variance estimator performs satisfactorily. A real-data application is discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802261459842
Primary Topic
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations

Mandi Yu, J.Z. Zhang, Jiming Jiang
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
article

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations

Mandi Yu, J.Z. Zhang, Jiming Jiang
article en

Abstract

We develop a robust bias-corrected method of inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates (RASR) for comparing the age-standardized rate (ASR) between a subpopulation and the whole population. Unlike previous methods, the proposed approach does not rely on the proportional age-distribution (PAD) assumption, which is often unrealistic in many situations. Like an existing approach, the method corrects for bias resulting from sampling errors when using sample-based population estimates, instead of census-based populations, as the denominators for estimating ASRs. This broadens the applicability of the proposed method in studying cancer risk factors beyond the basic demographic characteristics. The robust bias-corrected estimator of the RASR and the associated variance estimator and confidence intervals are derived. We show empirically that the proposed RASR estimator performs significantly better than the existing estimator, which relies on the PAD assumption, especially when the latter assumption fails. Specifically, the proposed RASR estimator significantly reduces the bias without increasing the variance. On the other hand, when the PAD assumption holds, our RASR estimator performs similarly to the existing estimator. The proposed method has also shown highly desirable performance when at-risk population estimates used for calculating ASRs are subject to sampling errors. We also show empirically that the proposed variance estimator performs satisfactorily. A real-data application is discussed.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
University of California System (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.