Complexities, gaps, and risks in simulating AI empathy

Abstract Empathy is linked to several positive outcomes including health, morality, positive interpersonal relationships, group cooperation and social harmony. It is a complex socioemotional experience that entails cognitive, affective, motivational, and behavioral dynamic, interactive processes. The positive potential of AI agents as human companions is laudable to pursue but there are serious risks and challenges. Despite these risks and challenges, engineers have committed themselves to develop empathy capacity in AI agents. Scholars have noted that AI agents can simulate some aspects of empathy (cognitive empathy) but are known to be limited in their capacity to simulate authentic empathy (known as the empathy gap). The present essay extends this discussion in several directions and highlights multiple gaps in AI empathy. First, we draw attention to the biological, psychological, interpersonal, and developmental processes that pose challenges in the ability for AI to feel authentic empathy for a human. Second, we assert the need for any effort to simulate authentic AI empathy for a human, to account for culture-group processes and differences. And third, we present a heuristic model of empathy to highlight the complexities of simulating authentic AI empathy for humans. We conclude with several important implications on the dangers and limits of AI human empathy, especially as generative AI interactions with children proliferate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI Brain and Child
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44436-026-00037-3
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexities, gaps, and risks in simulating AI empathy

Kelsyann Cervera, Gustavo Carlo, June Ahn
AI Brain and Child
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Complexities, gaps, and risks in simulating AI empathy

Kelsyann Cervera, Gustavo Carlo, June Ahn
article en

Abstract

Abstract Empathy is linked to several positive outcomes including health, morality, positive interpersonal relationships, group cooperation and social harmony. It is a complex socioemotional experience that entails cognitive, affective, motivational, and behavioral dynamic, interactive processes. The positive potential of AI agents as human companions is laudable to pursue but there are serious risks and challenges. Despite these risks and challenges, engineers have committed themselves to develop empathy capacity in AI agents. Scholars have noted that AI agents can simulate some aspects of empathy (cognitive empathy) but are known to be limited in their capacity to simulate authentic empathy (known as the empathy gap). The present essay extends this discussion in several directions and highlights multiple gaps in AI empathy. First, we draw attention to the biological, psychological, interpersonal, and developmental processes that pose challenges in the ability for AI to feel authentic empathy for a human. Second, we assert the need for any effort to simulate authentic AI empathy for a human, to account for culture-group processes and differences. And third, we present a heuristic model of empathy to highlight the complexities of simulating authentic AI empathy for humans. We conclude with several important implications on the dangers and limits of AI human empathy, especially as generative AI interactions with children proliferate.

AI Brain and ChildVol. 2(1)
University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.