Introduction

This special issue consists of selected papers presented at a workshop held at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in Amsterdam in August, 2025, called “Assembling Revolutions: Bridging Theories of Revolutions and Theories of Social Movements.” Both fields were dominated from the 1970s through the 1990s by structuralist perspectives that downplayed agency, culture, emotions, and the interactions among strategic actors. In Dynamics of Contention in 2001, Doug McAdam, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly – in an effort to move past their own structuralism – challenged social scientists to study revolutions, social movements, and other processes together under the rubric of “contentious politics,” using concepts common to all. We wanted to know, how far have we gotten? What are some causal processes found in both revolutionary and nonrevolutionary contention?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642261461966
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction

Jan Willem Duyvendak, ANNA ZHELNINA, James M. Jasper
American Behavioral Scientist
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Introduction

Jan Willem Duyvendak, ANNA ZHELNINA, James M. Jasper
article en

Abstract

This special issue consists of selected papers presented at a workshop held at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in Amsterdam in August, 2025, called “Assembling Revolutions: Bridging Theories of Revolutions and Theories of Social Movements.” Both fields were dominated from the 1970s through the 1990s by structuralist perspectives that downplayed agency, culture, emotions, and the interactions among strategic actors. In Dynamics of Contention in 2001, Doug McAdam, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly – in an effort to move past their own structuralism – challenged social scientists to study revolutions, social movements, and other processes together under the rubric of “contentious politics,” using concepts common to all. We wanted to know, how far have we gotten? What are some causal processes found in both revolutionary and nonrevolutionary contention?

American Behavioral Scientist
Utrecht University (NL), Dutch Cancer Society (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.