Factors associated with lost to follow-up (LTFU) among patients with hypertension: A scoping review

Regular follow-up appointments are essential for effective hypertension management; however, many patients fail to attend scheduled visits and become lost to follow-up (LTFU). Understanding the factors associated with LTFU is important for preventing hypertension-related complications such as stroke, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disorders. This scoping review aimed to identify factors associated with LTFU among patients with hypertension and to summarize the terminology and timeframes used to define LTFU in the literature. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed for studies published between 2010 and 2025 across MEDLINE, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and grey literature sources. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (Registration: https://osf.io/a2wsg/). The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using design-specific tools. A total of 4,039 records were identified, and after removing duplicates, 2,956 articles were screened. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including six cross-sectional studies, four mixed-methods studies, one qualitative study, one retrospective case-control study, and one cohort study. Nine studies were rated as high quality and four as moderate quality. The definitions and terminology used to characterize LTFU varied considerably across studies. Factors associated with LTFU were grouped into five categories: patient-related, treatment and disease-related, healthcare provider-related, health service and system-related, and interpersonal factors. Patient-related factors were most frequently reported, followed by treatment and disease characteristics, while healthcare provider, service, and system-related factors were less commonly described. Interpersonal factors were reported in only three studies. This scoping review identified a range of patient-, treatment-, healthcare provider-, and health system-related factors contributing to LTFU among patients with hypertension. The findings highlight the complexity of LTFU in hypertension care and underscore the need for targeted strategies to strengthen follow-up mechanisms, improve patient engagement, and enhance continuity of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0006240
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors associated with lost to follow-up (LTFU) among patients with hypertension: A scoping review

Weena Stanley, Bhageerathy Reshmi, Prajwal Lemuel Salins, Partha Protim Hazarika et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Factors associated with lost to follow-up (LTFU) among patients with hypertension: A scoping review

Weena Stanley, Bhageerathy Reshmi, Prajwal Lemuel Salins, Partha Protim Hazarika, Raksha Kamath
article en

Abstract

Regular follow-up appointments are essential for effective hypertension management; however, many patients fail to attend scheduled visits and become lost to follow-up (LTFU). Understanding the factors associated with LTFU is important for preventing hypertension-related complications such as stroke, cardiovascular disease, and kidney disorders. This scoping review aimed to identify factors associated with LTFU among patients with hypertension and to summarize the terminology and timeframes used to define LTFU in the literature. A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed for studies published between 2010 and 2025 across MEDLINE, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and grey literature sources. The review protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (Registration: https://osf.io/a2wsg/). The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using design-specific tools. A total of 4,039 records were identified, and after removing duplicates, 2,956 articles were screened. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including six cross-sectional studies, four mixed-methods studies, one qualitative study, one retrospective case-control study, and one cohort study. Nine studies were rated as high quality and four as moderate quality. The definitions and terminology used to characterize LTFU varied considerably across studies. Factors associated with LTFU were grouped into five categories: patient-related, treatment and disease-related, healthcare provider-related, health service and system-related, and interpersonal factors. Patient-related factors were most frequently reported, followed by treatment and disease characteristics, while healthcare provider, service, and system-related factors were less commonly described. Interpersonal factors were reported in only three studies. This scoping review identified a range of patient-, treatment-, healthcare provider-, and health system-related factors contributing to LTFU among patients with hypertension. The findings highlight the complexity of LTFU in hypertension care and underscore the need for targeted strategies to strengthen follow-up mechanisms, improve patient engagement, and enhance continuity of care.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(6)
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Mahatma Gandhi Mission Institute of Health Sciences (IN), Kasturba Medical College, Manipal (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.