Transverse versus longitudinal skin incisions for totally implantable venous access port implantation: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely used in oncologic patients requiring long-term vascular access. However, the impact of skin incision orientation on postprocedural pain, procedural efficiency, and early complications remains unclear. This study compared transverse and longitudinal incisions in terms of early postoperative pain, patient-reported discomfort, procedure duration, and complication rates. METHODS: In this randomized, single-center study, 170 patients undergoing TIVAP implantation were assigned to either a transverse or longitudinal incision group (85 patients each). All procedures followed a standardized protocol with ultrasound-guided venous access and fluoroscopic confirmation of catheter tip position. Pain intensity was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) within 24 h, and patient-reported discomfort was evaluated on day 7. Procedural characteristics and early complications were recorded. RESULTS: Postprocedural pain was low in both groups, with most patients reporting NRS scores between 0 and 2. Analgesic requirements were minimal, with no significant between-group differences. Discomfort at day 7 was also low and comparable. Procedure duration showed a trend toward shorter times in the transverse incision group [20 (18; 30) vs. 25 (20; 35) minutes; p = 0.09]. Overall complication rates were low, with no major complications. Minor complications included local inflammatory reactions and hematomas. Bleeding within the port pocket was more frequent in the longitudinal incision group, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse and longitudinal incisions provide comparable outcomes in TIVAP implantation, with low pain, minimal discomfort, and low complication rates. A trend toward shorter procedure duration and less port pocket bleeding with transverse incisions suggests potential technical advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06766656 (Registered January 04, 2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04122-2
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transverse versus longitudinal skin incisions for totally implantable venous access port implantation: a randomized controlled trial

Jarosław Woroń, Wojciech Szpunar, Drygalski Tomasz, Michał Terlecki et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Transverse versus longitudinal skin incisions for totally implantable venous access port implantation: a randomized controlled trial

Jarosław Woroń, Wojciech Szpunar, Drygalski Tomasz, Michał Terlecki, Anna Kwinta, Paweł Maciejewski, Tomasz Składzień, Cicio Michal, Tomasz Lonc, Aleksandra Żmuda
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are widely used in oncologic patients requiring long-term vascular access. However, the impact of skin incision orientation on postprocedural pain, procedural efficiency, and early complications remains unclear. This study compared transverse and longitudinal incisions in terms of early postoperative pain, patient-reported discomfort, procedure duration, and complication rates. METHODS: In this randomized, single-center study, 170 patients undergoing TIVAP implantation were assigned to either a transverse or longitudinal incision group (85 patients each). All procedures followed a standardized protocol with ultrasound-guided venous access and fluoroscopic confirmation of catheter tip position. Pain intensity was assessed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) within 24 h, and patient-reported discomfort was evaluated on day 7. Procedural characteristics and early complications were recorded. RESULTS: Postprocedural pain was low in both groups, with most patients reporting NRS scores between 0 and 2. Analgesic requirements were minimal, with no significant between-group differences. Discomfort at day 7 was also low and comparable. Procedure duration showed a trend toward shorter times in the transverse incision group [20 (18; 30) vs. 25 (20; 35) minutes; p = 0.09]. Overall complication rates were low, with no major complications. Minor complications included local inflammatory reactions and hematomas. Bleeding within the port pocket was more frequent in the longitudinal incision group, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Transverse and longitudinal incisions provide comparable outcomes in TIVAP implantation, with low pain, minimal discomfort, and low complication rates. A trend toward shorter procedure duration and less port pocket bleeding with transverse incisions suggests potential technical advantages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06766656 (Registered January 04, 2025).

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Jagiellonian University (PL), University School of Physical Education in Kraków (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.