Ethical Consultation Utilization Patterns in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: A 10-Year Single-Center Study and Contemporary Ethics Framework

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15–39 years) with cancer face unique ethical challenges. Variations in ethics consultations (ECs) among different AYA age groups remain understudied, despite evolving developmental and psychosocial milestones. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review at an academic medical center examined EC cases in AYA oncology patients. Ethicists categorized ethical issues using an institutional 5 domains, 23-category classification schema Decisional Processes, Medical/Surgical Treatments, Patient/Family Behavior, Professional Issues, and Information/Communication. Categories included surrogate decision-making, informed consent, pain management, and resuscitation status/do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. Multiple categories could be documented per EC. Primary outcomes were (1) the distribution of categories across domains and (2) the prevalence of specific categories among patients, compared across age groups (15–21, 22–29, and 30–39 years) using χ 2 or Fisher’s exact tests (α = 0.05). Results: Among 59 ECs (mean patient age 26.4 ± 7.1 years; 52.5% female), Decisional Processes accounted for 41% of category applications, followed by Medical/Surgical Treatments (25%), Patient/Family Behavior (12%), Professional Issues (12%), and Information/Communication (9%). A total of 153 categories were recorded. The most common were surrogate decision-making (45%), quality-of-life (QoL) considerations (37%, including QoL deliberations [20%] and treatment-related QoL concerns [17%]), informed consent (20%), and DNR (18%). The distribution was consistent across age groups, except for pain control, observed only in 22–29-year-olds (3/16; p = 0.014). Conclusion: Decision-making primarily drove EC with consistent patterns across the AYA spectrum, except for pain control in 22–29-year-olds. Findings emphasize the need for structured decision-making approaches and age-specific pain management in AYA oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21565333261464967
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Consultation Utilization Patterns in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: A 10-Year Single-Center Study and Contemporary Ethics Framework

Joshua S. Crites, Kara Bendle, Stefanie M. Thomas, Miza Salim Hammoud et al.
Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Ethical Consultation Utilization Patterns in Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology: A 10-Year Single-Center Study and Contemporary Ethics Framework

Joshua S. Crites, Kara Bendle, Stefanie M. Thomas, Miza Salim Hammoud, Rachel N. Zeno, Kate Eshleman, Arjan Kalra
article en

Abstract

Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15–39 years) with cancer face unique ethical challenges. Variations in ethics consultations (ECs) among different AYA age groups remain understudied, despite evolving developmental and psychosocial milestones. Methods: A 10-year retrospective review at an academic medical center examined EC cases in AYA oncology patients. Ethicists categorized ethical issues using an institutional 5 domains, 23-category classification schema Decisional Processes, Medical/Surgical Treatments, Patient/Family Behavior, Professional Issues, and Information/Communication. Categories included surrogate decision-making, informed consent, pain management, and resuscitation status/do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. Multiple categories could be documented per EC. Primary outcomes were (1) the distribution of categories across domains and (2) the prevalence of specific categories among patients, compared across age groups (15–21, 22–29, and 30–39 years) using χ 2 or Fisher’s exact tests (α = 0.05). Results: Among 59 ECs (mean patient age 26.4 ± 7.1 years; 52.5% female), Decisional Processes accounted for 41% of category applications, followed by Medical/Surgical Treatments (25%), Patient/Family Behavior (12%), Professional Issues (12%), and Information/Communication (9%). A total of 153 categories were recorded. The most common were surrogate decision-making (45%), quality-of-life (QoL) considerations (37%, including QoL deliberations [20%] and treatment-related QoL concerns [17%]), informed consent (20%), and DNR (18%). The distribution was consistent across age groups, except for pain control, observed only in 22–29-year-olds (3/16; p = 0.014). Conclusion: Decision-making primarily drove EC with consistent patterns across the AYA spectrum, except for pain control in 22–29-year-olds. Findings emphasize the need for structured decision-making approaches and age-specific pain management in AYA oncology.

Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), University School (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.