Comparison of Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Testing and Immunohistochemical Staining in Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Fusion Genes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Large Single-Centre Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a driver gene translocation detected in 3–5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based tests are the standard of care for detecting actionable gene alterations; however, false negatives remain a concern. Immunohistochemical staining is another reliable, rapid, and low-cost method for detecting ALK fusions. Previous studies have reported high concordance with NGS, although further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients with NSCLC who were tested using the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT), an amplicon-based DNA and RNA NGS test for NSCLC, and ALK-immunohistochemistry (IHC) at our institution between 8 August 2019 and 11 April 2025. Results: Of 919 eligible patients included in this study, ALK fusion was detected in 30 (3.26%) patients, whereas ALK-IHC was positive in 35 (3.80%) patients. The concordance and κ coefficient of the two tests were 99.4% and 0.920, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ALK-IHC for ODxTT were 100%, 99.4%, 85.7%, and 100%, respectively. Five discordant patients were NGS negative and IHC positive. Among the five discordant cases, one had a false-negative NGS result, whereas the remaining four had false-positive ALK-IHC results, including three patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Conclusions: ALK-IHC shows diagnostic accuracy comparable to ODxTT, although prudent interpretation is needed for patients without adenocarcinoma. Our findings suggest the complementary role of ALK-IHC alongside NGS-based testing, particularly in patients with a high pre-test probability of harbouring ALK fusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18132125
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Testing and Immunohistochemical Staining in Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Fusion Genes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Large Single-Centre Cohort Study

Shuji Murakami, Shuhei Teranishi, Haruhiro Saito, Seigo Katakura et al.
Cancers
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Comparison of Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Testing and Immunohistochemical Staining in Detecting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Fusion Genes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Large Single-Centre Cohort Study

Shuji Murakami, Shuhei Teranishi, Haruhiro Saito, Seigo Katakura, Yuichiro Suzukawa, Tetsuro Kondo, Yuto Tagawa
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion is a driver gene translocation detected in 3–5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based tests are the standard of care for detecting actionable gene alterations; however, false negatives remain a concern. Immunohistochemical staining is another reliable, rapid, and low-cost method for detecting ALK fusions. Previous studies have reported high concordance with NGS, although further studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients with NSCLC who were tested using the Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT), an amplicon-based DNA and RNA NGS test for NSCLC, and ALK-immunohistochemistry (IHC) at our institution between 8 August 2019 and 11 April 2025. Results: Of 919 eligible patients included in this study, ALK fusion was detected in 30 (3.26%) patients, whereas ALK-IHC was positive in 35 (3.80%) patients. The concordance and κ coefficient of the two tests were 99.4% and 0.920, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ALK-IHC for ODxTT were 100%, 99.4%, 85.7%, and 100%, respectively. Five discordant patients were NGS negative and IHC positive. Among the five discordant cases, one had a false-negative NGS result, whereas the remaining four had false-positive ALK-IHC results, including three patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Conclusions: ALK-IHC shows diagnostic accuracy comparable to ODxTT, although prudent interpretation is needed for patients without adenocarcinoma. Our findings suggest the complementary role of ALK-IHC alongside NGS-based testing, particularly in patients with a high pre-test probability of harbouring ALK fusions.

CancersVol. 18(13)
Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.