“I Will Try to Fix You”: A Qualitative Investigation on Italian Women Struggling With Chronic Pelvic Pain

OBJECTIVES: To explore how Italian women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) describe and interpret clinicians' language, assessment and treatment recommendations, and how these perceived encounters may relate to meaning-making, activity behaviors, and expectations of rehabilitation. DESIGN: Qualitative observational study using semi-structured one-to-one online interviews. Interviews were audio-video recorded, transcribed verbatim, pseudonymized, and analyzed using inductive, semantic, and reflexive thematic analysis. SETTING: Online interviews conducted in Italy. Participants described experiences across routine healthcare encounters; no single clinical center was involved. PARTICIPANTS: Adult Italian women reporting a specialist diagnosis of CPP consistent with ICD-11 were eligible. Twenty-one women were recruited and completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: No experimental intervention was delivered. The study examined participants' experiences of usual care, including prior clinical assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the identification of themes representing how participants interpreted and responded to clinicians' explanations and management approaches. Supporting descriptive measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Örebro short form, and Pain and Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Questionnaire (PPIQ). RESULTS: Twenty-one women (mean age 30.47 years) reported high symptom burden and psychosocial risk (mean NPRS 6.8; mean Örebro 62.23; mean PPIQ 19.85). Four interrelated themes were generated: (1) Trigger points as the root cause of pain; (2) Need to avoid everything; (3) Diagnosis: reassurance or stigma; and (4) Manual Therapy: will it fix me? Divergent accounts indicated that clear explanations and shared decisions were described by some participants as supporting re-engagement in meaningful activities despite persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Women with CPP in this sample often described muscle-centered explanations and restrictive advice as influential in their understanding of pain, activity choices, and expectations of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Research International
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70273
Primary Topic
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I Will Try to Fix You”: A Qualitative Investigation on Italian Women Struggling With Chronic Pelvic Pain

Gabriele Giannotta, Matteo Cioeta, Giuseppe Girardi, Giuseppe Giovannico et al.
Physiotherapy Research International
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
article

“I Will Try to Fix You”: A Qualitative Investigation on Italian Women Struggling With Chronic Pelvic Pain

Gabriele Giannotta, Matteo Cioeta, Giuseppe Girardi, Giuseppe Giovannico, Roberta Giovinazzi, Michele Marelli, Chiara Leuci, Fabio Bernardi, Nadia Laterza
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore how Italian women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) describe and interpret clinicians' language, assessment and treatment recommendations, and how these perceived encounters may relate to meaning-making, activity behaviors, and expectations of rehabilitation. DESIGN: Qualitative observational study using semi-structured one-to-one online interviews. Interviews were audio-video recorded, transcribed verbatim, pseudonymized, and analyzed using inductive, semantic, and reflexive thematic analysis. SETTING: Online interviews conducted in Italy. Participants described experiences across routine healthcare encounters; no single clinical center was involved. PARTICIPANTS: Adult Italian women reporting a specialist diagnosis of CPP consistent with ICD-11 were eligible. Twenty-one women were recruited and completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: No experimental intervention was delivered. The study examined participants' experiences of usual care, including prior clinical assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the identification of themes representing how participants interpreted and responded to clinicians' explanations and management approaches. Supporting descriptive measures included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Örebro short form, and Pain and Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Questionnaire (PPIQ). RESULTS: Twenty-one women (mean age 30.47 years) reported high symptom burden and psychosocial risk (mean NPRS 6.8; mean Örebro 62.23; mean PPIQ 19.85). Four interrelated themes were generated: (1) Trigger points as the root cause of pain; (2) Need to avoid everything; (3) Diagnosis: reassurance or stigma; and (4) Manual Therapy: will it fix me? Divergent accounts indicated that clear explanations and shared decisions were described by some participants as supporting re-engagement in meaningful activities despite persistent symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Women with CPP in this sample often described muscle-centered explanations and restrictive advice as influential in their understanding of pain, activity choices, and expectations of care.

Physiotherapy Research InternationalVol. 31(3)
University of Molise (IT)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Endometriosis Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.