Negotiating Knowledge: Evidential Verbs and Stance in Early Modern English

This article explores the modulation of seven verbs that mark source of information in English: believe, hear, know, remember , see , seem , and think . Drawing data from two collections of Early Modern English legal records, the study shows that modulation is of five main types: negation, degree modification, evidential combination, frequency, and justification. The analysis reveals that the modulation fulfills communicative, stance needs related to the language users’ roles as witnesses or participants in a court case. Some uses are localized, responding to situational needs (such as negating a particular piece of information and the evidential foundation of that information), while others involve moves that were likely expected and conventional in testimony (such as expressing sincere conviction). Overall, the study highlights the importance of evidentials as stance resources in historical periods and the need for further attention to such interactional stance means in the description of the history of English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of English Linguistics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242261451442
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Knowledge: Evidential Verbs and Stance in Early Modern English

Peter J. Grund
Journal of English Linguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Negotiating Knowledge: Evidential Verbs and Stance in Early Modern English

Peter J. Grund
article en

Abstract

This article explores the modulation of seven verbs that mark source of information in English: believe, hear, know, remember , see , seem , and think . Drawing data from two collections of Early Modern English legal records, the study shows that modulation is of five main types: negation, degree modification, evidential combination, frequency, and justification. The analysis reveals that the modulation fulfills communicative, stance needs related to the language users’ roles as witnesses or participants in a court case. Some uses are localized, responding to situational needs (such as negating a particular piece of information and the evidential foundation of that information), while others involve moves that were likely expected and conventional in testimony (such as expressing sincere conviction). Overall, the study highlights the importance of evidentials as stance resources in historical periods and the need for further attention to such interactional stance means in the description of the history of English.

Journal of English Linguistics
Yale University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negotiating Knowledge: Evidential Verbs and Stance in Early Modern English — Peter J. Grund · Journal of English Linguistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS