Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Insulin Efsitora for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Even though insulin therapy is the cornerstone of diabetes mellitus management, multiple daily injections are associated with poor adherence. Once-weekly basal insulin therapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic approach and is being evaluated in multiple ongoing clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin efsitora therapy compared with once-daily basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Primary endpoints include glycemic control, assessed via HbA1c reduction, and hypoglycemia, classified as level 1 (54-69 mg/dL), level 2 (<54 mg/dl), or level 3 (any hypoglycemic episode characterized by altered mental and/or physical functioning requiring assistance). We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis through an extensive literature search of major databases including Scopus, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane databases, and have only included randomized controlled trials. We have included 5 randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 2,562 patients: 1,358 (53%) in the insulin efsitora arm and 1,204 (47%) in the insulin degludec arm. Our data show that insulin efsitora therapy achieved a similar HbA1c reduction overall (estimated treatment difference (ETD) 0.08%, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.17; I² = 42.6%), in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (ETD 0.10%, 95% CI -0.64-0.85; I² =24.0%) and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ETD 0.05%, 95% CI -0.25 - 0.26; I² = 38.1%) compared with insulin degludec therapy. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were identified in overall hypoglycemic events, level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic episodes, or nocturnal hypoglycemia, irrespective of diabetes mellitus subtype. Our meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference between once-weekly insulin efsitora therapy and insulin degludec therapy in terms of glycemic control and hypoglycemic events.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medeniyet Medical Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/mmj.galenos.2026.35858
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Insulin Efsitora for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Berk Mizrak, Laşin Özbek, Mehmet Kanbay, Adnan Batman et al.
Medeniyet Medical Journal
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Insulin Efsitora for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

Berk Mizrak, Laşin Özbek, Mehmet Kanbay, Adnan Batman, Sidar Çöpür, Duygu Uçku, Adrian COVIC, Abduzhappar GAIPOV, Daniel van RAALTE
article en

Abstract

Even though insulin therapy is the cornerstone of diabetes mellitus management, multiple daily injections are associated with poor adherence. Once-weekly basal insulin therapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic approach and is being evaluated in multiple ongoing clinical trials. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin efsitora therapy compared with once-daily basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Primary endpoints include glycemic control, assessed via HbA1c reduction, and hypoglycemia, classified as level 1 (54-69 mg/dL), level 2 (<54 mg/dl), or level 3 (any hypoglycemic episode characterized by altered mental and/or physical functioning requiring assistance). We have performed a systematic review and meta-analysis through an extensive literature search of major databases including Scopus, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane databases, and have only included randomized controlled trials. We have included 5 randomized controlled trials comprising a total of 2,562 patients: 1,358 (53%) in the insulin efsitora arm and 1,204 (47%) in the insulin degludec arm. Our data show that insulin efsitora therapy achieved a similar HbA1c reduction overall (estimated treatment difference (ETD) 0.08%, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.17; I² = 42.6%), in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (ETD 0.10%, 95% CI -0.64-0.85; I² =24.0%) and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (ETD 0.05%, 95% CI -0.25 - 0.26; I² = 38.1%) compared with insulin degludec therapy. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were identified in overall hypoglycemic events, level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic episodes, or nocturnal hypoglycemia, irrespective of diabetes mellitus subtype. Our meta-analysis shows no statistically significant difference between once-weekly insulin efsitora therapy and insulin degludec therapy in terms of glycemic control and hypoglycemic events.

Medeniyet Medical JournalVol. 41(2)
Koç University (TR), Institutul Național de Endocrinologie C.I. Parhon (RO), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Nazarbayev University (KZ), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.