Microbiological Contamination of Nasal Topical Preparations Used After Septoplasty: A Comparative Analysis

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbiological contamination rates of nasal topical preparations (sprays, drops, and ointments) used after septoplasty at the nozzle/tube tip and drug content levels.The study also aimed to compare contamination levels in different formulations. Methods:This prospective cross-sectional study included 110 patients (spray: n=38; drop: n=34; ointment: n=38) who underwent septoplasty at the ENT clinic.Patients returned their preparations after at least two weeks' postoperative use.Two separate samples were obtained from each preparation: a swab of the nozzle or tube tip and the drug content.These specimens were inoculated onto blood agar, chocolate agar, and Sabouraud dextrose agar.Isolate identification was performed using the VITEK MS (MALDI-TOF MS) system.Results: Nozzle contamination was detected in 62.7% (n=69) of the 110 preparations, and content contamination was detected in 40.9% (n=45).Nozzle contamination was significantly higher in the spray group (89.5%) than in the drop (44.1%) and ointment (52.6%) groups (p<0.001).The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulasenegative staphylococci (particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis) and Staphylococcus aureus.Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Klebsiella spp.and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and yeast species (e.g., Candida parapsilosis and Candida haemulonii) were detected less frequently.Conclusions: Spray formulations showed higher nozzle contamination rates than other formulations, whereas drug-content contamination appeared similar across groups.These findings suggest that contamination may occur in topical nasal preparations used after septoplasty and highlight the importance of patient education regarding hygienic use during the postoperative period.However, because baseline sterility testing and laboratory negative controls were not performed, the source of contamination cannot be determined conclusively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medeniyet Medical Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/mmj.galenos.2026.87339
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbiological Contamination of Nasal Topical Preparations Used After Septoplasty: A Comparative Analysis

Batın Berkay Öznacar, Zafer Habip, Numan Kökten, Serdal Çelik et al.
Medeniyet Medical Journal
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

Microbiological Contamination of Nasal Topical Preparations Used After Septoplasty: A Comparative Analysis

Batın Berkay Öznacar, Zafer Habip, Numan Kökten, Serdal Çelik, Berina Slipcevic, Mustafa HATIPOGLU, Zeynep AZ AYDIN, M. Tayyar KALCIOGLU
article en

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the microbiological contamination rates of nasal topical preparations (sprays, drops, and ointments) used after septoplasty at the nozzle/tube tip and drug content levels.The study also aimed to compare contamination levels in different formulations. Methods:This prospective cross-sectional study included 110 patients (spray: n=38; drop: n=34; ointment: n=38) who underwent septoplasty at the ENT clinic.Patients returned their preparations after at least two weeks' postoperative use.Two separate samples were obtained from each preparation: a swab of the nozzle or tube tip and the drug content.These specimens were inoculated onto blood agar, chocolate agar, and Sabouraud dextrose agar.Isolate identification was performed using the VITEK MS (MALDI-TOF MS) system.Results: Nozzle contamination was detected in 62.7% (n=69) of the 110 preparations, and content contamination was detected in 40.9% (n=45).Nozzle contamination was significantly higher in the spray group (89.5%) than in the drop (44.1%) and ointment (52.6%) groups (p<0.001).The most frequently isolated microorganisms were coagulasenegative staphylococci (particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis) and Staphylococcus aureus.Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., Klebsiella spp.and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and yeast species (e.g., Candida parapsilosis and Candida haemulonii) were detected less frequently.Conclusions: Spray formulations showed higher nozzle contamination rates than other formulations, whereas drug-content contamination appeared similar across groups.These findings suggest that contamination may occur in topical nasal preparations used after septoplasty and highlight the importance of patient education regarding hygienic use during the postoperative period.However, because baseline sterility testing and laboratory negative controls were not performed, the source of contamination cannot be determined conclusively.

Medeniyet Medical JournalVol. 41(2)
İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Istanbul Medeniyet University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.