Inflammatory Profile of Lipedema: A Comparative Evaluation with Obese and Normal-weight Women

Abstract Lipedema is a chronic disorder characterized by disproportionate subcutaneous fat accumulation and pain, with an incompletely understood inflammatory component. It remains unclear whether this inflammatory profile is disease-specific or primarily driven by coexisting adiposity. This study aimed to evaluate systemic inflammatory markers in women with lipedema compared with women with obesity and normal-weight controls. This retrospective study included 229 women aged 30–65 years: 78 with lipedema, 76 with obesity without lipedema, and 75 normal-weight controls. Demographic and laboratory data were obtained from medical records. Inflammatory indices, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, and C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte index, were calculated. Group comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests. Age was similar across groups, whereas body mass index was significantly higher in the lipedema and obesity groups than in controls (p<0.001). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein level, and CAR were significantly higher in both the lipedema and obesity groups compared with controls, whereas no significant differences were observed between lipedema and obesity groups. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, and C-reactive protein–albumin–lymphocyte index did not differ significantly among groups. Inflammatory indices were generally comparable across lipedema grades. These findings suggest that lipedema is associated with low-grade systemic inflammation; however, its inflammatory profile largely overlaps with obesity, indicating shared inflammatory mechanisms rather than a distinct systemic inflammatory phenotype. Among the evaluated markers, C-reactive protein-based parameters, particularly the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio, appeared to better reflect inflammatory burden than hematological composite indices.