Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co‐Designed Model of Prehabilitation for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant physical and emotional effects. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering "Prep-4-Radiotherapy (RT)", a multi-modal, risk-stratified approach to prehabilitation for people with HNC. METHODS: HNC patients planned for radiotherapy were screened for psychological distress, malnutrition, sarcopenia, dysphagia, and reduced physical function using self-report measures. Low-risk patients were provided access to self-management resources. High-risk patients were additionally referred to relevant allied health disciplines for specialist prehabilitation and provided access to self-management resources. The feasibility of Prep-4-RT was judged against a priori criteria. Primary feasibility outcomes included patient adoption (uptake: ≥ 70% of eligible patients consent to screening; intention to try: ≥ 60% of patients utilize self-management resources and ≥ 70% of high-risk patient participants verbally accept referrals to specialist prehabilitation) and fidelity (adherence to specialist pathway: ≥ 70% of high-risk patients receive specialist prehabilitation and attend ≥ 70% of scheduled prehabilitation appointments). RESULTS: Point estimates for four of five primary outcomes indicated acceptable feasibility. The point estimate for the fifth primary outcome, adherence as assessed by the percentage of high-risk patients assigned to specialist prehabilitation who received care from required clinicians before radiotherapy, indicated feasibility with further revision. CONCLUSION: Prep-4-RT appears to offer a feasible risk-stratified program to provide prehabilitation to HNC patients prior to radiotherapy, though results for some criteria were characterized by notable missing data. Further evaluation is required to determine its effect on clinical and health service outcomes. REGISTRATION DETAILS: ANZCTA (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry) ACTRN12623000770662.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Head & Neck
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.70351
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co‐Designed Model of Prehabilitation for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

Ella T. S. Sexton, Maria Ftanou, Jenelle Loeliger, K M Gough et al.
Head & Neck
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Co‐Designed Model of Prehabilitation for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy

Ella T. S. Sexton, Maria Ftanou, Jenelle Loeliger, K M Gough, Jacqui Frowen, Shaza Abo, Michael Barton, Wendy Poon, Hannah J. Ray, Shannon P. Turnbull
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant physical and emotional effects. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering "Prep-4-Radiotherapy (RT)", a multi-modal, risk-stratified approach to prehabilitation for people with HNC. METHODS: HNC patients planned for radiotherapy were screened for psychological distress, malnutrition, sarcopenia, dysphagia, and reduced physical function using self-report measures. Low-risk patients were provided access to self-management resources. High-risk patients were additionally referred to relevant allied health disciplines for specialist prehabilitation and provided access to self-management resources. The feasibility of Prep-4-RT was judged against a priori criteria. Primary feasibility outcomes included patient adoption (uptake: ≥ 70% of eligible patients consent to screening; intention to try: ≥ 60% of patients utilize self-management resources and ≥ 70% of high-risk patient participants verbally accept referrals to specialist prehabilitation) and fidelity (adherence to specialist pathway: ≥ 70% of high-risk patients receive specialist prehabilitation and attend ≥ 70% of scheduled prehabilitation appointments). RESULTS: Point estimates for four of five primary outcomes indicated acceptable feasibility. The point estimate for the fifth primary outcome, adherence as assessed by the percentage of high-risk patients assigned to specialist prehabilitation who received care from required clinicians before radiotherapy, indicated feasibility with further revision. CONCLUSION: Prep-4-RT appears to offer a feasible risk-stratified program to provide prehabilitation to HNC patients prior to radiotherapy, though results for some criteria were characterized by notable missing data. Further evaluation is required to determine its effect on clinical and health service outcomes. REGISTRATION DETAILS: ANZCTA (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry) ACTRN12623000770662.

Head & Neck
Deakin University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), Paediatric Integrated Cancer Service (AU)
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.