Protestant–Karaite Dialogue or Anti-Judaic Polemic? A Case Study of Jacobus Trigland and Mordecai ben Nisan

From the early Middle Ages to the Modern Period, most documented polemics between Christians and Jews took the form of fierce disputes about the tenets of both religions, with the two sides almost never engaging in dialogue. The emergence of Protestantism brought about a new phenomenon in anti-Judaic debates: a dialogue between Protestants and representatives of the Karaites’ Talmudless version of Judaism. The Protestants’ interest in Karaism stemmed from their perception of the Karaite movement as rejecting the “distortions” of the Oral Torah. They perceived Karaism as similar to Protestantism, which repudiated the “distorted” Catholic tradition in favor of Scripture, the sole legitimate source of authority for both Protestantism and Karaism. The Protestants therefore formed a positive and even idealized image of Karaism and initiated dialogue with Karaite sages. One of the most illustrative examples of such dialogue was the interaction in the late 1790s between Jacobus Trigland, a Protestant Hebraist and professor at Leiden University, and Mordecai ben Nisan, a prominent Eastern European Karaite sage. This study considers the interaction not merely as a dialogue between representatives of two religious movements, but also as an instrument of interreligious and interconfessional polemics expressed by Protestantism and Karaism against both mainstream, Rabbanite Talmudic Judaism and Catholicism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17070783
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protestant–Karaite Dialogue or Anti-Judaic Polemic? A Case Study of Jacobus Trigland and Mordecai ben Nisan

Golda Akhiezer
Religions
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Protestant–Karaite Dialogue or Anti-Judaic Polemic? A Case Study of Jacobus Trigland and Mordecai ben Nisan

Golda Akhiezer
article en

Abstract

From the early Middle Ages to the Modern Period, most documented polemics between Christians and Jews took the form of fierce disputes about the tenets of both religions, with the two sides almost never engaging in dialogue. The emergence of Protestantism brought about a new phenomenon in anti-Judaic debates: a dialogue between Protestants and representatives of the Karaites’ Talmudless version of Judaism. The Protestants’ interest in Karaism stemmed from their perception of the Karaite movement as rejecting the “distortions” of the Oral Torah. They perceived Karaism as similar to Protestantism, which repudiated the “distorted” Catholic tradition in favor of Scripture, the sole legitimate source of authority for both Protestantism and Karaism. The Protestants therefore formed a positive and even idealized image of Karaism and initiated dialogue with Karaite sages. One of the most illustrative examples of such dialogue was the interaction in the late 1790s between Jacobus Trigland, a Protestant Hebraist and professor at Leiden University, and Mordecai ben Nisan, a prominent Eastern European Karaite sage. This study considers the interaction not merely as a dialogue between representatives of two religious movements, but also as an instrument of interreligious and interconfessional polemics expressed by Protestantism and Karaism against both mainstream, Rabbanite Talmudic Judaism and Catholicism.

ReligionsVol. 17(7)
Ariel University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.