Improving Data Leakage Detection in Machine Learning Notebooks through Static Slicing and Structured LLM Prompts

Data leakage remains a critical yet under-diagnosed issue in machine learning pipelines, leading to inflated results and unreliable deployments. Existing detection approaches rely on static rules that often miss open-coded manipulations and fail to capture the diversity of real-world notebooks. This paper introduces a novel methodology that integrates static slicing with large language models (LLMs) to improve leakage detection. We use a Datalog-based static analysis that isolates compact, provenance-aware slices corresponding to model training and evaluation pairs, and we pair these with structured LLM prompts that guide step-by-step reasoning about potential leakage for each isolated slice. Evaluated on a curated benchmark of Python notebooks from Kaggle and GitHub, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in both preprocessing and overlap leakage detection, improving F1 scores over the previous state-of-the-art by 22% for preprocessing leakage and 15% for overlap leakage. Beyond these improvements, our slicing-based methodology substantially outperforms end-to-end prompting, demonstrating that precise program slicing is key to enabling LLMs to reliably detect leakage. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of combining program slicing and prompt engineering for data leakage detection and establish the first systematic LLM-based solution for detecting data leakage in machine learning code.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3808199
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Data Leakage Detection in Machine Learning Notebooks through Static Slicing and Structured LLM Prompts

Christian D. Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Taha Draoui
Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Improving Data Leakage Detection in Machine Learning Notebooks through Static Slicing and Structured LLM Prompts

Christian D. Newman, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer, Taha Draoui
article en

Abstract

Data leakage remains a critical yet under-diagnosed issue in machine learning pipelines, leading to inflated results and unreliable deployments. Existing detection approaches rely on static rules that often miss open-coded manipulations and fail to capture the diversity of real-world notebooks. This paper introduces a novel methodology that integrates static slicing with large language models (LLMs) to improve leakage detection. We use a Datalog-based static analysis that isolates compact, provenance-aware slices corresponding to model training and evaluation pairs, and we pair these with structured LLM prompts that guide step-by-step reasoning about potential leakage for each isolated slice. Evaluated on a curated benchmark of Python notebooks from Kaggle and GitHub, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in both preprocessing and overlap leakage detection, improving F1 scores over the previous state-of-the-art by 22% for preprocessing leakage and 15% for overlap leakage. Beyond these improvements, our slicing-based methodology substantially outperforms end-to-end prompting, demonstrating that precise program slicing is key to enabling LLMs to reliably detect leakage. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of combining program slicing and prompt engineering for data leakage detection and establish the first systematic LLM-based solution for detecting data leakage in machine learning code.

Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.Vol. 3(FSE)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of Michigan–Flint (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.