Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: the role of timing and baseline hematoma volume

Abstract Background Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown efficacy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), but optimal patient selection and timing (pre-, post-surgical, or standalone) remain unclear. This study evaluated the impact of volume, and embolization timing on outcomes at discharge and follow-up. Methods The study included 135 patients undergoing MMAE; only those with complete radiological data were analyzed. To reduce baseline clinical bias, patients were stratified into quartiles (Q) based on preoperative hematoma volume. Changes in functional status were assessed by calculating the difference in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between admission and discharge (ΔmRS a➝d ), as well as between admission and follow-up (ΔmRS a➝f ). The entire cohort was divided into three groups based on the timing of MMAE: pre-surgical, post-surgical and standalone. Results At admission, mRS distribution differed across quartiles ( p = 0.005), with better functional status more common in Q1 and higher mRS (≥ 3) increasing in larger volumes. At discharge, outcomes varied by embolization timing ( p < 0.001). Stand-alone treatment was associated with greater clinical stability, especially in Q1, while improvement increased with hematoma volume in the pre-surgical group. The post-surgical group showed a milder pattern of severity compared to the pre-surgical group. The same trends were observed at follow-up. On multivariable analysis, admission mRS was the strongest predictor of poor outcome (mRS ≥ 3) (OR 6.209, p < 0.001), with age also significant (OR 1.078, p = 0.027). Preoperative hematoma volume was the only independent predictor of reoperation (OR 1.017, p = 0.017). Conclusion Discharge outcome was mainly driven by admission mRS and age, while preoperative hematoma volume was associated with reoperation risk. In patients with lower hematoma burden (Q1-Q2), stand-alone MMAE showed greater early functional stability than pre- or post-surgical strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroradiology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-026-04074-w
Primary Topic
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: the role of timing and baseline hematoma volume

Iacopo Valente, Alessandro Olivi, Francesco D’Argento, Giuseppe Garignano et al.
Neuroradiology
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
article

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: the role of timing and baseline hematoma volume

Iacopo Valente, Alessandro Olivi, Francesco D’Argento, Giuseppe Garignano, Alessandro Pedicelli, Alessio Albanese, Andrea Alexandre, Francesco Doglietto, Matteo Palermo, Carmelo Lucio Sturiale
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has shown efficacy for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), but optimal patient selection and timing (pre-, post-surgical, or standalone) remain unclear. This study evaluated the impact of volume, and embolization timing on outcomes at discharge and follow-up. Methods The study included 135 patients undergoing MMAE; only those with complete radiological data were analyzed. To reduce baseline clinical bias, patients were stratified into quartiles (Q) based on preoperative hematoma volume. Changes in functional status were assessed by calculating the difference in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between admission and discharge (ΔmRS a➝d ), as well as between admission and follow-up (ΔmRS a➝f ). The entire cohort was divided into three groups based on the timing of MMAE: pre-surgical, post-surgical and standalone. Results At admission, mRS distribution differed across quartiles ( p = 0.005), with better functional status more common in Q1 and higher mRS (≥ 3) increasing in larger volumes. At discharge, outcomes varied by embolization timing ( p < 0.001). Stand-alone treatment was associated with greater clinical stability, especially in Q1, while improvement increased with hematoma volume in the pre-surgical group. The post-surgical group showed a milder pattern of severity compared to the pre-surgical group. The same trends were observed at follow-up. On multivariable analysis, admission mRS was the strongest predictor of poor outcome (mRS ≥ 3) (OR 6.209, p < 0.001), with age also significant (OR 1.078, p = 0.027). Preoperative hematoma volume was the only independent predictor of reoperation (OR 1.017, p = 0.017). Conclusion Discharge outcome was mainly driven by admission mRS and age, while preoperative hematoma volume was associated with reoperation risk. In patients with lower hematoma burden (Q1-Q2), stand-alone MMAE showed greater early functional stability than pre- or post-surgical strategies.

Neuroradiology
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.