Striving for control: a cross-linguistic framework for analyzing stance markers in English and Chinese tourism short videos

Abstract This study proposes a cross-linguistic framework for analyzing stance markers. The framework links cultural preferences for different intersubjectivity types to the argumentative strength encoded in stance markers, operationalized through the Control Cycle Model, thereby generating testable predictions about the distributional patterns of stance markers in English and Chinese tourism short videos (TSVs). Comparable corpora were compiled from the subtitles of popular TSVs sourced from YouTube and Douyin , and the distributional patterns of epistemic and effective stance markers were analyzed. Our findings indicate that stance markers with moderate to strong argumentative strength are preferred in both English and Chinese TSVs, reflecting the evaluation-oriented and action-guiding nature of TSVs. With respect to cross-linguistic differences, English TSVs favor stance markers with strong argumentative strength, whereas Chinese TSVs tend to rely on markers with moderate argumentative strength. These divergent preferences are shown to reflect culturally distinct orientations toward attitudinal versus responsive intersubjectivity. The study illustrates how this framework can trace cultural differences in stance marker distribution to dimensions of embodied cognition related to epistemic and effective control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intercultural Pragmatics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2026-0045
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Striving for control: a cross-linguistic framework for analyzing stance markers in English and Chinese tourism short videos

马辰庭, H W Yang, Yi’na Wang
Intercultural Pragmatics
Categorization, perception, and language
article

Striving for control: a cross-linguistic framework for analyzing stance markers in English and Chinese tourism short videos

马辰庭, H W Yang, Yi’na Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study proposes a cross-linguistic framework for analyzing stance markers. The framework links cultural preferences for different intersubjectivity types to the argumentative strength encoded in stance markers, operationalized through the Control Cycle Model, thereby generating testable predictions about the distributional patterns of stance markers in English and Chinese tourism short videos (TSVs). Comparable corpora were compiled from the subtitles of popular TSVs sourced from YouTube and Douyin , and the distributional patterns of epistemic and effective stance markers were analyzed. Our findings indicate that stance markers with moderate to strong argumentative strength are preferred in both English and Chinese TSVs, reflecting the evaluation-oriented and action-guiding nature of TSVs. With respect to cross-linguistic differences, English TSVs favor stance markers with strong argumentative strength, whereas Chinese TSVs tend to rely on markers with moderate argumentative strength. These divergent preferences are shown to reflect culturally distinct orientations toward attitudinal versus responsive intersubjectivity. The study illustrates how this framework can trace cultural differences in stance marker distribution to dimensions of embodied cognition related to epistemic and effective control.

Intercultural Pragmatics
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN), Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN), Beihang University (CN), Hebei Normal University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.