A Tribunal Only in Name: Anarchic Sensibilities at the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women, 1976

Abstract In March 1976, around 2000 women from forty countries arrived at the Palais des Congrès in Brussels to participate in the first International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women. Explicitly positioning themselves against the United Nations‐led ‘International Year of the Woman’, the organizers and participants of the tribunal proclaimed a global sisterhood – to be achieved through the sharing of personal experience and by testifying against the litany of patriarchal crimes committed against women. In this article, I analyse the proceedings of the Brussels Tribunal to recover a fractious episode of the transnational feminist movement of the 1970s. I argue that by examining how the participants navigated their deep‐seated feminist disagreements, the Brussels Tribunal complicates our understanding of the politics of sisterhood and identity politics in the international women's movement. I also explore the controversies surrounding the event and the revolt against the organizers to understand how the anarchic sensibilities and praxis of the participants were productive for generating an alternative feminist vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-229x.70136
Primary Topic
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tribunal Only in Name: Anarchic Sensibilities at the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women, 1976

NIVEDITA JOON
History
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
article

A Tribunal Only in Name: Anarchic Sensibilities at the International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women, 1976

NIVEDITA JOON
article en

Abstract

Abstract In March 1976, around 2000 women from forty countries arrived at the Palais des Congrès in Brussels to participate in the first International Tribunal on Crimes Against Women. Explicitly positioning themselves against the United Nations‐led ‘International Year of the Woman’, the organizers and participants of the tribunal proclaimed a global sisterhood – to be achieved through the sharing of personal experience and by testifying against the litany of patriarchal crimes committed against women. In this article, I analyse the proceedings of the Brussels Tribunal to recover a fractious episode of the transnational feminist movement of the 1970s. I argue that by examining how the participants navigated their deep‐seated feminist disagreements, the Brussels Tribunal complicates our understanding of the politics of sisterhood and identity politics in the international women's movement. I also explore the controversies surrounding the event and the revolt against the organizers to understand how the anarchic sensibilities and praxis of the participants were productive for generating an alternative feminist vision.

History
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.