Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are assistive devices that support the ankle during gait. AFO mechanical properties, such as rotational stiffness about the ankle, influence the level of support these devices provide. Interest in quantifying AFO mechanical properties is on the rise but is limited by the lack of standardized measurement and assessment techniques. This scoping review discusses existing techniques for the measurement of AFO mechanical properties and introduces a taxonomy for organizing and describing these methods. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using a snowballing approach starting from two previously published literature reviews and a database search using PubMed, Engineering Village (Compendex), and Web of Science. Articles with methods that experimentally measured the mechanical properties of AFOs were eligible for inclusion. Data extracted from the selected articles included operation specifications, planes/joints tested, and presence of a biological or surrogate limb during AFO testing. DISCUSSION: The majority of methods utilize benchtop AFO testing, with a few in-situ methods that involve a biological limb. We highlight key design challenges related to replicating biological gait, including bending axis location and design, motion in single versus multiple planes, and limited testing speeds and range of motion. CONCLUSION: We introduced a taxonomy for describing AFO testing methods to facilitate cross-device comparisons and inform future development. Future work should include developing standardized, biomimetic methods and validation techniques for testing a variety of AFO designs. This would enable more accurate AFO measurement and enable cross-study comparisons, ultimately leading to optimized AFO properties and improved user performance outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02072-w
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review

Deema Totah, Zachary Williston, Katherine Vaiciulis
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review

Deema Totah, Zachary Williston, Katherine Vaiciulis
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are assistive devices that support the ankle during gait. AFO mechanical properties, such as rotational stiffness about the ankle, influence the level of support these devices provide. Interest in quantifying AFO mechanical properties is on the rise but is limited by the lack of standardized measurement and assessment techniques. This scoping review discusses existing techniques for the measurement of AFO mechanical properties and introduces a taxonomy for organizing and describing these methods. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using a snowballing approach starting from two previously published literature reviews and a database search using PubMed, Engineering Village (Compendex), and Web of Science. Articles with methods that experimentally measured the mechanical properties of AFOs were eligible for inclusion. Data extracted from the selected articles included operation specifications, planes/joints tested, and presence of a biological or surrogate limb during AFO testing. DISCUSSION: The majority of methods utilize benchtop AFO testing, with a few in-situ methods that involve a biological limb. We highlight key design challenges related to replicating biological gait, including bending axis location and design, motion in single versus multiple planes, and limited testing speeds and range of motion. CONCLUSION: We introduced a taxonomy for describing AFO testing methods to facilitate cross-device comparisons and inform future development. Future work should include developing standardized, biomimetic methods and validation techniques for testing a variety of AFO designs. This would enable more accurate AFO measurement and enable cross-study comparisons, ultimately leading to optimized AFO properties and improved user performance outcomes.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
University of Iowa (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.