Information, Agency, and the Trinity

Theology and science has, for traditional sciences, been a two way street. It should be no surprise then that foundational issues in semantic information theory and AI may provide insights into religious dogmas: in this case, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. In the early days of information theory and AI, Donald M. Mackay developed two particular theories based on his research in these domains: complementarityand logical indeterminism. Each of these gives insight to the nature and behaviour of agents (artificial and natural). He also applied these theories to provide further understanding of different aspects of the Trinity. In this paper, we will see how extended and corrected versions of these can provide an understanding of why the Godhead must be multi-personal. Complementarity gives an illustrative model of the Godhead given that He is triune, whereas modal indeterminism shows why incarnation requires multi-personality (the economic Trinity). Here, we also extend the analysis to the ontological Trinity and argue that modal indeterminism also necessitates that each individual person of the Godhead cannot be absolutely omniscient (but only omniscient after their Person): only the Godhead can be absolutely omniscient. This has implications for the general relation between the persons of the Trinity, and suggests that absolute omniscience requires the unity of classical theism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17070782
Primary Topic
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Information, Agency, and the Trinity

George M. Coghill
Religions
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
article

Information, Agency, and the Trinity

George M. Coghill
article en

Abstract

Theology and science has, for traditional sciences, been a two way street. It should be no surprise then that foundational issues in semantic information theory and AI may provide insights into religious dogmas: in this case, the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. In the early days of information theory and AI, Donald M. Mackay developed two particular theories based on his research in these domains: complementarityand logical indeterminism. Each of these gives insight to the nature and behaviour of agents (artificial and natural). He also applied these theories to provide further understanding of different aspects of the Trinity. In this paper, we will see how extended and corrected versions of these can provide an understanding of why the Godhead must be multi-personal. Complementarity gives an illustrative model of the Godhead given that He is triune, whereas modal indeterminism shows why incarnation requires multi-personality (the economic Trinity). Here, we also extend the analysis to the ontological Trinity and argue that modal indeterminism also necessitates that each individual person of the Godhead cannot be absolutely omniscient (but only omniscient after their Person): only the Godhead can be absolutely omniscient. This has implications for the general relation between the persons of the Trinity, and suggests that absolute omniscience requires the unity of classical theism.

ReligionsVol. 17(7)
University of Aberdeen (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Theology and Philosophy of Evil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.