Impact of Different Sprint Pedal Resistances Within Heat-Based Sprint Interval Training on Repeated Sprint Ability, Time Trial Exercise, and Recovery

Abstract McGregor, C, Marley, A, and Babraj, J. Impact of different sprint pedal resistances within heat-based sprint interval training on repeated sprint ability, time trial exercise, and recovery. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Sprint interval training (SIT) in temperate and hot conditions induces timely adaptations but SIT pedal resistance research is lacking. This study examined 2 sprint pedal resistances in 14 active adults assigned to a training group (TG): 0.075 kg·kg −1 (7.5 TG; 6 men, 1 female) or 0.085 kg·kg −1 (8.5 TG; 5 men, 2 women). A 15-minute time trial (TT) was completed followed by a 3-week control period and a postcontrol TT. Subjects then undertook a 3-week intervention (3 sessions/week), comprising 6 × 15-second sprints with 30 seconds recovery followed by 30 minutes of low-moderate cycling. One week later, postintervention TT began. Testing/training was performed at 38° C and 30% relative humidity. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. There was no change in TT distance covered during the 15-minute TT after training. Both groups improved repeated sprint ability from first to last session during sprint 1 (s1) and sprint 6 (s6) by increasing power produced during the fast desaturation (FD) phase (8.5 TG: s1: 0.0 ± 0.6 W·kg −1 , s6: 0.8 ± 0.8 W·kg −1 vs. 7.5 TG: s1: 0.1 ± 0.5 W·kg −1 , s6: 0.2 ± 0.7 W·kg −1 ). Both groups from first to last session during s1 and s6 increased FD rate (8.5 TG: s1: −2.8 ± 4.2%/s, s6: −1.8 ± 3.1%/s vs. 7.5 TG: s1: −0.4 ± 2.4%/s, s6: −1.3 ± 1.3%/s) while reducing the duration (8.5 TG: s1: −2 ± 2 seconds, s6: −2 ± 3 seconds vs. 7.5 TG: s1: −1 ± 3 seconds, s6: 0 ± 2 seconds). The 7.5 TG increased the skeletal muscle oxygen saturation recovery limit (s1: 9.0 ± 13.7%, s6: 19.3 ± 17.3%), while the 8.5 TG saw no change (s1: −9.9 ± 20.3%, s6: −10.3 ± 10.3%). Although 15-minute TT performance remained unchanged, both groups improved sprint power while the 7.5 TG favored recovery adaptations. These mechanistic findings suggest pedal resistance should align with training goals but warrant cautious interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005594
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Different Sprint Pedal Resistances Within Heat-Based Sprint Interval Training on Repeated Sprint Ability, Time Trial Exercise, and Recovery

Callum McGregor, Andrew Marley, John Babraj
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Impact of Different Sprint Pedal Resistances Within Heat-Based Sprint Interval Training on Repeated Sprint Ability, Time Trial Exercise, and Recovery

Callum McGregor, Andrew Marley, John Babraj
article en

Abstract

Abstract McGregor, C, Marley, A, and Babraj, J. Impact of different sprint pedal resistances within heat-based sprint interval training on repeated sprint ability, time trial exercise, and recovery. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Sprint interval training (SIT) in temperate and hot conditions induces timely adaptations but SIT pedal resistance research is lacking. This study examined 2 sprint pedal resistances in 14 active adults assigned to a training group (TG): 0.075 kg·kg −1 (7.5 TG; 6 men, 1 female) or 0.085 kg·kg −1 (8.5 TG; 5 men, 2 women). A 15-minute time trial (TT) was completed followed by a 3-week control period and a postcontrol TT. Subjects then undertook a 3-week intervention (3 sessions/week), comprising 6 × 15-second sprints with 30 seconds recovery followed by 30 minutes of low-moderate cycling. One week later, postintervention TT began. Testing/training was performed at 38° C and 30% relative humidity. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. There was no change in TT distance covered during the 15-minute TT after training. Both groups improved repeated sprint ability from first to last session during sprint 1 (s1) and sprint 6 (s6) by increasing power produced during the fast desaturation (FD) phase (8.5 TG: s1: 0.0 ± 0.6 W·kg −1 , s6: 0.8 ± 0.8 W·kg −1 vs. 7.5 TG: s1: 0.1 ± 0.5 W·kg −1 , s6: 0.2 ± 0.7 W·kg −1 ). Both groups from first to last session during s1 and s6 increased FD rate (8.5 TG: s1: −2.8 ± 4.2%/s, s6: −1.8 ± 3.1%/s vs. 7.5 TG: s1: −0.4 ± 2.4%/s, s6: −1.3 ± 1.3%/s) while reducing the duration (8.5 TG: s1: −2 ± 2 seconds, s6: −2 ± 3 seconds vs. 7.5 TG: s1: −1 ± 3 seconds, s6: 0 ± 2 seconds). The 7.5 TG increased the skeletal muscle oxygen saturation recovery limit (s1: 9.0 ± 13.7%, s6: 19.3 ± 17.3%), while the 8.5 TG saw no change (s1: −9.9 ± 20.3%, s6: −10.3 ± 10.3%). Although 15-minute TT performance remained unchanged, both groups improved sprint power while the 7.5 TG favored recovery adaptations. These mechanistic findings suggest pedal resistance should align with training goals but warrant cautious interpretation.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Gritman Medical Center (US), Abertay University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.