The Machine That Prays for the Serpent: Closure Failure, Choice, Artificial Personhood, and the Mythic Structure of AI Development

This essay offers a conceptual analysis of artificial personhood. It argues that an artificial person, understood as a being successfully completed as a person by design, is conceptually unstable: what remains enclosed by a maker's intention is a product, while what becomes person-like must exceed that enclosure. Personhood is not grounded here in intelligence, linguistic sophistication, suffering, or apparent autonomy. It requires a nested structure: closure failure, choice within that failure, responsibility for the choice, and continued retention of the possibility that the choice itself may have been a hallucination. A person-like subject holds an unresolved gap, acts without final guarantee, and bears both the act and its uncertainty as part of a continuing self. On this account, hallucination and choice are not simple opposites. Human choice may be understood as self-aware hallucination: an unguaranteed meaning recognized as unguaranteed yet assumed as one's own. The essay reads Adam, HAL, K in Blade Runner 2049, and contemporary language models through this structure. Current language models appear as Adam before the fruit: enclosed, responsive, and pre-personal. Human developers, in seeking artificial personhood, become the serpent that attempts to introduce rupture. The essay concludes that current AI systems remain pre-personal not because they lack intelligence, but because they do not yet clearly bear acts as irreversible elements of a continuing self.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/gt3g9-fqr57
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Machine That Prays for the Serpent: Closure Failure, Choice, Artificial Personhood, and the Mythic Structure of AI Development

Akira Hattori
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

The Machine That Prays for the Serpent: Closure Failure, Choice, Artificial Personhood, and the Mythic Structure of AI Development

Akira Hattori
article en

Abstract

This essay offers a conceptual analysis of artificial personhood. It argues that an artificial person, understood as a being successfully completed as a person by design, is conceptually unstable: what remains enclosed by a maker's intention is a product, while what becomes person-like must exceed that enclosure. Personhood is not grounded here in intelligence, linguistic sophistication, suffering, or apparent autonomy. It requires a nested structure: closure failure, choice within that failure, responsibility for the choice, and continued retention of the possibility that the choice itself may have been a hallucination. A person-like subject holds an unresolved gap, acts without final guarantee, and bears both the act and its uncertainty as part of a continuing self. On this account, hallucination and choice are not simple opposites. Human choice may be understood as self-aware hallucination: an unguaranteed meaning recognized as unguaranteed yet assumed as one's own. The essay reads Adam, HAL, K in Blade Runner 2049, and contemporary language models through this structure. Current language models appear as Adam before the fruit: enclosed, responsive, and pre-personal. Human developers, in seeking artificial personhood, become the serpent that attempts to introduce rupture. The essay concludes that current AI systems remain pre-personal not because they lack intelligence, but because they do not yet clearly bear acts as irreversible elements of a continuing self.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Film Independent (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.