Practical Multivariate Equivalency Testing for Additively Manufactured Parts: Comparing Independent and Dependent Cases

Additive manufacturing (AM) requalification and change-control workflows often require evidence that a candidate machine, parameter set, scanner subsystem, facility, or measurement workflow remains comparable to a stable reference process after a change, but fabrication and testing costs limit exhaustive multifeature studies. The aim of this study was to address this engineering design problem by developing a practical multifeature equivalency screening framework for AM settings in which prior engineering evidence already suggests that the candidate process should be comparable to the reference process. Building on prior work focused on the univariate problem, the proposed framework uses reference-defined percentile bins, feature-wise distributional tests, and family-wise error-rate control to screen for evidence of non-equivalency across multiple measured attributes. A direct joint-binning approach was first shown to become sample-intensive as dimensionality increases, after which an independent feature-wise method and an exploratory dependent bivariate extension were developed. Simulation-based power analyses quantified the trade-offs among power, detectable effect size, distributional resolution, feature count, and the combined costs of fabrication and measurement. In a laser-based powder bed fusion validation study with 40 observations per process and three corner-deviation features, the expected-equivalent AconityMIDI+ candidate satisfied all feature-wise equivalency criteria (V˜=0.207–0.214<CI+=0.276), whereas the expected non-equivalent SLM280 HL candidate failed all three feature-wise tests (V˜=0.357–1.000>CI+=0.276). These results support multivariate equivalency as a requalification screening tool for AM process comparability and change control, while confirming that it should not be interpreted as proof of physical-process identity or as a replacement for first-time formal qualification. Core procedures are implemented in the open-source R package MultivariateEquivalency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10070229
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical Multivariate Equivalency Testing for Additively Manufactured Parts: Comparing Independent and Dependent Cases

Jorge Mireles, J. René Villalobos, Colin M. Lynch, Ryan B. Wicker et al.
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

Practical Multivariate Equivalency Testing for Additively Manufactured Parts: Comparing Independent and Dependent Cases

Jorge Mireles, J. René Villalobos, Colin M. Lynch, Ryan B. Wicker, Brenda Leticia Valadez Mesta, Cesar Gomez Guillen
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) requalification and change-control workflows often require evidence that a candidate machine, parameter set, scanner subsystem, facility, or measurement workflow remains comparable to a stable reference process after a change, but fabrication and testing costs limit exhaustive multifeature studies. The aim of this study was to address this engineering design problem by developing a practical multifeature equivalency screening framework for AM settings in which prior engineering evidence already suggests that the candidate process should be comparable to the reference process. Building on prior work focused on the univariate problem, the proposed framework uses reference-defined percentile bins, feature-wise distributional tests, and family-wise error-rate control to screen for evidence of non-equivalency across multiple measured attributes. A direct joint-binning approach was first shown to become sample-intensive as dimensionality increases, after which an independent feature-wise method and an exploratory dependent bivariate extension were developed. Simulation-based power analyses quantified the trade-offs among power, detectable effect size, distributional resolution, feature count, and the combined costs of fabrication and measurement. In a laser-based powder bed fusion validation study with 40 observations per process and three corner-deviation features, the expected-equivalent AconityMIDI+ candidate satisfied all feature-wise equivalency criteria (V˜=0.207–0.214<CI+=0.276), whereas the expected non-equivalent SLM280 HL candidate failed all three feature-wise tests (V˜=0.357–1.000>CI+=0.276). These results support multivariate equivalency as a requalification screening tool for AM process comparability and change control, while confirming that it should not be interpreted as proof of physical-process identity or as a replacement for first-time formal qualification. Core procedures are implemented in the open-source R package MultivariateEquivalency.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(7)
The University of Texas at El Paso (US), Integrated Solutions for Systems (United States) (US), Education Trust (US), Arizona State University (US)
University of Texas at El Paso, Air Force Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.