Comparison of Bresenham and Siddon ray tracing algorithms for sparse view 3D reconstruction of simulated coronary vessel models

Interventional C-arm imaging enables minimally invasive cardiac procedures while reducing radiation exposure through sparse-view acquisition. However, reconstruction of three-dimensional vascular morphology from a limited number of projections remains a severely ill-posed inverse problem, particularly in the presence of Poisson quantum noise. This study evaluates two ray-tracing models, Siddon’s (weighted) and Bresenham’s (binary), combined with the Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique (SIRT) and Total Variation regularization (SIRT+TV). Synthetic phantoms derived from patient-specific coronary geometries were reconstructed from nine simulated noisy cone-beam projections acquired at different angles. Reconstructed volumes were binarized using Otsu and IoU-maximized thresholds. Automatic Otsu thresholding was ineffective for Bresenham-based reconstructions due to severe reconstruction artifacts. Nevertheless, IoU-maximized thresholding yielded a mean Dice-Sørensen coefficient of 0.795, indicating preservation of relevant vascular information. Siddon-based reconstruction produced fewer artifacts and achieved superior performance, reaching a Dice-Sørensen coefficient of 0.860 with SIRT. No clear advantage of TV regularization over SIRT alone was observed. The results demonstrate that key aspects of vascular morphology can be recovered from sparse-view projections. However, the observed reconstruction errors indicate that substantial methodological improvements are required before practical application can be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-79689-3
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparison of Bresenham and Siddon ray tracing algorithms for sparse view 3D reconstruction of simulated coronary vessel models

Alireza Binesh, Piotr M. Szczypiński
Scientific Reports
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Bresenham and Siddon ray tracing algorithms for sparse view 3D reconstruction of simulated coronary vessel models

Alireza Binesh, Piotr M. Szczypiński
article en

Abstract

Interventional C-arm imaging enables minimally invasive cardiac procedures while reducing radiation exposure through sparse-view acquisition. However, reconstruction of three-dimensional vascular morphology from a limited number of projections remains a severely ill-posed inverse problem, particularly in the presence of Poisson quantum noise. This study evaluates two ray-tracing models, Siddon’s (weighted) and Bresenham’s (binary), combined with the Simultaneous Iterative Reconstruction Technique (SIRT) and Total Variation regularization (SIRT+TV). Synthetic phantoms derived from patient-specific coronary geometries were reconstructed from nine simulated noisy cone-beam projections acquired at different angles. Reconstructed volumes were binarized using Otsu and IoU-maximized thresholds. Automatic Otsu thresholding was ineffective for Bresenham-based reconstructions due to severe reconstruction artifacts. Nevertheless, IoU-maximized thresholding yielded a mean Dice-Sørensen coefficient of 0.795, indicating preservation of relevant vascular information. Siddon-based reconstruction produced fewer artifacts and achieved superior performance, reaching a Dice-Sørensen coefficient of 0.860 with SIRT. No clear advantage of TV regularization over SIRT alone was observed. The results demonstrate that key aspects of vascular morphology can be recovered from sparse-view projections. However, the observed reconstruction errors indicate that substantial methodological improvements are required before practical application can be considered.

Scientific Reports
Lodz University of Technology (PL)
Good health and well-being
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon