To Exclude or Protect: Unaccompanied Minors and the Failures of Immigration Law

This article reviews research on unaccompanied minors—children under 18 who migrate alone and without legal authorization—who are subject to contradictory host country governance regimes that both exclude and protect them. I juxtapose legal scholarship examining the contradictory laws governing unaccompanied minors with sociolegal research that examines the gaps between the law in books and the law in action. The first part reviews scholarship examining legal provisions vis-à-vis unaccompanied minors, their inherent contradictions, and how these vary across contexts. I discuss debates on the intersection of age and migration, the best interests principle, and how refugee law falls short in protecting children. I next compare governance regimes in the European Union and United States. The second part shifts focus to the implementation of law by discussing how legal advocates and unaccompanied children engage with, contest, and reproduce ambivalent legal regimes. I end by suggesting avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-100208
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Exclude or Protect: Unaccompanied Minors and the Failures of Immigration Law

Chiara Galli
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

To Exclude or Protect: Unaccompanied Minors and the Failures of Immigration Law

Chiara Galli
article en

Abstract

This article reviews research on unaccompanied minors—children under 18 who migrate alone and without legal authorization—who are subject to contradictory host country governance regimes that both exclude and protect them. I juxtapose legal scholarship examining the contradictory laws governing unaccompanied minors with sociolegal research that examines the gaps between the law in books and the law in action. The first part reviews scholarship examining legal provisions vis-à-vis unaccompanied minors, their inherent contradictions, and how these vary across contexts. I discuss debates on the intersection of age and migration, the best interests principle, and how refugee law falls short in protecting children. I next compare governance regimes in the European Union and United States. The second part shifts focus to the implementation of law by discussing how legal advocates and unaccompanied children engage with, contest, and reproduce ambivalent legal regimes. I end by suggesting avenues for future research.

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
University of Chicago (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.