The Impact of Non-Gaussian Line Spread Functions on Stellar Kinematic Recovery: Consequences for Dynamical Models

The line spread function (LSF) of a spectrograph encodes the inherent broadening of a single spectral line. It is typically reported as a single number, the resolving power R = λ / Δ λ with Δ λ the FWHM of the LSF. In standard pipelines for extracting stellar kinematics the LSF is assumed to be a wavelength dependent Gaussian. However, detailed LSF measurements from real integral field spectrographs reveal a variety of shapes, some close to Gaussian, others with large wings or that appear boxy. I have studied the impact that these non-Gaussian LSF profiles have on the recovery of the stellar kinematics of a mock spectrum based on MUSE ( = 51 km s) and find that even in the high dispersion case of 300 km s, there is up to a 7 percent bias in the dispersion due to non-Gaussian LSF profiles. Additionally, higher order Gauss-Hermite moments h 3 and h 4 can be biased by up to $$0.1. To resolve this bias, I developed a method to match the LSF of the template spectra to the LSF of a target spectrum when the LSF of either one or both is non-Gaussian and show that it can reduce bias in the dispersion to less than a percent down to the instrumental resolution. A Python implementation of this method has been made publicly available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.168763
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Non-Gaussian Line Spread Functions on Stellar Kinematic Recovery: Consequences for Dynamical Models

David A. Simon
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
article

The Impact of Non-Gaussian Line Spread Functions on Stellar Kinematic Recovery: Consequences for Dynamical Models

David A. Simon
article en

Abstract

The line spread function (LSF) of a spectrograph encodes the inherent broadening of a single spectral line. It is typically reported as a single number, the resolving power R = λ / Δ λ with Δ λ the FWHM of the LSF. In standard pipelines for extracting stellar kinematics the LSF is assumed to be a wavelength dependent Gaussian. However, detailed LSF measurements from real integral field spectrographs reveal a variety of shapes, some close to Gaussian, others with large wings or that appear boxy. I have studied the impact that these non-Gaussian LSF profiles have on the recovery of the stellar kinematics of a mock spectrum based on MUSE ( = 51 km s) and find that even in the high dispersion case of 300 km s, there is up to a 7 percent bias in the dispersion due to non-Gaussian LSF profiles. Additionally, higher order Gauss-Hermite moments h 3 and h 4 can be biased by up to $$0.1. To resolve this bias, I developed a method to match the LSF of the template spectra to the LSF of a target spectrum when the LSF of either one or both is non-Gaussian and show that it can reduce bias in the dispersion to less than a percent down to the instrumental resolution. A Python implementation of this method has been made publicly available.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 9
ORCID (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.