Biological and Genetic Approaches in Mosquito Vector Control: Current Advances and Future Challenges

BACKGROUND: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) continue to pose major public health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Conventional vector control strategies, including insecticide spraying, insecticide-treated bed nets, and larvicidal interventions, have substantially reduced disease burden; however, the emergence of insecticide resistance has compromised the long-term effectiveness of these approaches. Consequently, environmentally sustainable biological and genetic vector control methods are increasingly being explored as alternative strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: , entomopathogenic fungi, and genetic control tools, including the sterile insect technique (SIT), incompatible insect technique (IIT), release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), and CRISPR-Cas9-based gene drive systems. RESULTS: Multiple biological and genetic interventions demonstrated substantial reductions in mosquito populations and pathogen transmission under experimental and field conditions. Wolbachia-based systems, SIT, IIT, and RIDL approaches showed promising operational feasibility and field validation, whereas gene drive technologies exhibited strong transformative potential but remain largely experimental. However, significant challenges persist, including scalability, infrastructure requirements, ecological uncertainty, biosafety concerns, regulatory complexity, and ethical considerations. Comparative evaluation indicates that these approaches differ considerably in technological maturity, deployment readiness, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging biological and genetic vector control strategies represent promising alternatives to conventional insecticide-based approaches for sustainable VBD management. Rather than relying on a single universal intervention, context-specific integration of complementary approaches within existing integrated vector management frameworks, supported by community participation and effective governance, is likely to provide more durable and environmentally sustainable solutions for controlling vector-borne diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15303667261458181
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological and Genetic Approaches in Mosquito Vector Control: Current Advances and Future Challenges

Nikhat Khan, M.K. Jain, Aparup Das
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Biological and Genetic Approaches in Mosquito Vector Control: Current Advances and Future Challenges

Nikhat Khan, M.K. Jain, Aparup Das
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) continue to pose major public health challenges, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Conventional vector control strategies, including insecticide spraying, insecticide-treated bed nets, and larvicidal interventions, have substantially reduced disease burden; however, the emergence of insecticide resistance has compromised the long-term effectiveness of these approaches. Consequently, environmentally sustainable biological and genetic vector control methods are increasingly being explored as alternative strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: , entomopathogenic fungi, and genetic control tools, including the sterile insect technique (SIT), incompatible insect technique (IIT), release of insects carrying a dominant lethal (RIDL), and CRISPR-Cas9-based gene drive systems. RESULTS: Multiple biological and genetic interventions demonstrated substantial reductions in mosquito populations and pathogen transmission under experimental and field conditions. Wolbachia-based systems, SIT, IIT, and RIDL approaches showed promising operational feasibility and field validation, whereas gene drive technologies exhibited strong transformative potential but remain largely experimental. However, significant challenges persist, including scalability, infrastructure requirements, ecological uncertainty, biosafety concerns, regulatory complexity, and ethical considerations. Comparative evaluation indicates that these approaches differ considerably in technological maturity, deployment readiness, and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging biological and genetic vector control strategies represent promising alternatives to conventional insecticide-based approaches for sustainable VBD management. Rather than relying on a single universal intervention, context-specific integration of complementary approaches within existing integrated vector management frameworks, supported by community participation and effective governance, is likely to provide more durable and environmentally sustainable solutions for controlling vector-borne diseases.

Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Regional Medical Research Centre (IN), National Institute of High Security Animal Diseases (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.