IMPLEMENTATION REALITIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF PARKLET-BASED ROAD SPACE RECONFIGURATION IN JAPAN’S INTRODUCTION PERIOD

This paper examines implementation realities and institutional challenges of parklet-based road space reconfiguration in Japan’s introduction period (2016–2021) through comparison with San Francisco’s Shared Spaces program. Based on interviews with stakeholders across all 11 documented cases and design document analysis, three findings emerge. First, most were authorized as temporary experiments yet built as permanent sidewalk extensions. Second, safety and accessibility standards varied widely without uniform guidelines. Third, financial sustainability depended on municipal subsidies rather than operator revenues. These contrast with San Francisco’s codified permit system enabling sustainable adoption through clear standards and cost-recovery mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3130/aija.91.1641
Primary Topic
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION REALITIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF PARKLET-BASED ROAD SPACE RECONFIGURATION IN JAPAN’S INTRODUCTION PERIOD

Katsuya Uozaki, Rui Izumiyama, So Fukatsu, Tomohiro Ueda et al.
Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
article

IMPLEMENTATION REALITIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF PARKLET-BASED ROAD SPACE RECONFIGURATION IN JAPAN’S INTRODUCTION PERIOD

Katsuya Uozaki, Rui Izumiyama, So Fukatsu, Tomohiro Ueda, Yusuke MUROTA
article en

Abstract

This paper examines implementation realities and institutional challenges of parklet-based road space reconfiguration in Japan’s introduction period (2016–2021) through comparison with San Francisco’s Shared Spaces program. Based on interviews with stakeholders across all 11 documented cases and design document analysis, three findings emerge. First, most were authorized as temporary experiments yet built as permanent sidewalk extensions. Second, safety and accessibility standards varied widely without uniform guidelines. Third, financial sustainability depended on municipal subsidies rather than operator revenues. These contrast with San Francisco’s codified permit system enabling sustainable adoption through clear standards and cost-recovery mechanisms.

Journal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)Vol. 91(845)
Nihon University (JP), Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology (KE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.