Weaponizing Your Name: How a Conservative Media Made Your Feminist Scholarship a Threat

This autoethnography examines the intersectional harm experienced by one Black American woman professor at a faith-based institution, whose feminist and critical pedagogy in communication became the target of conservative media in the United States. Written in second person to protect the professor’s identity and all involved, the piece demonstrates how epistemic surveillance and misrepresentation delegitimize Black women’s intellectual labor in white academic spaces. Through critical engagement with feminist and womanist thought, a central tension emerges between the public response the professor wishes to give, and the strategic silence required for survival and to minimize future targeting. The piece theorizes silence as calculated nonverbal resistance, revealing how Black women academics must navigate the impossible choice between speaking truth and protecting their precarious positions. This autoethnography illuminates the challenges women of Color face today when doing culturally responsive work in communication studies, centering the costs of such labor at the intersections of race, gender, and religion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Studies in Communication
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2026.2690646
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weaponizing Your Name: How a Conservative Media Made Your Feminist Scholarship a Threat

Niya Pickett Miller
Women s Studies in Communication
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

Weaponizing Your Name: How a Conservative Media Made Your Feminist Scholarship a Threat

Niya Pickett Miller
article en

Abstract

This autoethnography examines the intersectional harm experienced by one Black American woman professor at a faith-based institution, whose feminist and critical pedagogy in communication became the target of conservative media in the United States. Written in second person to protect the professor’s identity and all involved, the piece demonstrates how epistemic surveillance and misrepresentation delegitimize Black women’s intellectual labor in white academic spaces. Through critical engagement with feminist and womanist thought, a central tension emerges between the public response the professor wishes to give, and the strategic silence required for survival and to minimize future targeting. The piece theorizes silence as calculated nonverbal resistance, revealing how Black women academics must navigate the impossible choice between speaking truth and protecting their precarious positions. This autoethnography illuminates the challenges women of Color face today when doing culturally responsive work in communication studies, centering the costs of such labor at the intersections of race, gender, and religion.

Women s Studies in Communication
Samford University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.