Impact of Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator Score on Outcomes Following Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> The Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator (CORE) score is a novel model designed to predict the risk of liver disease. However, data regarding the prognostic utility of the CORE score in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the CORE score as a prognostic stratification tool for R-PDAC. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 242 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDAC between January 2009 and December 2023. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their preoperative CORE scores. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), comparing perioperative outcomes between the groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Of the 242 patients, 73 (30.2%) were classified into the high CORE score group (score &gt;0.9). Patients in the high CORE score group exhibited significantly worse five-year RFS (18.0% <i>vs.</i> 40.1%, <i>p</i>=0.001) and OS (25.9% <i>vs.</i> 51.0%, <i>p</i>=0.001) than those in the low CORE score group. Multivariate analyses identified a low CORE score as an independent predictor of RFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.53, <i>p</i>=0.014] and OS (HR=1.70, <i>p</i>=0.004). <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The CORE score is a robust, simple preoperative predictor of survival following pancreatectomy for R-PDAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
In Vivo
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.14364
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator Score on Outcomes Following Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Kosei Takagi, Naohiro Okada, Tomokazu Fuji, TAKEYOSHI NISHIYAMA et al.
In Vivo
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Impact of Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator Score on Outcomes Following Pancreatectomy for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Kosei Takagi, Naohiro Okada, Tomokazu Fuji, TAKEYOSHI NISHIYAMA, KAZUYA YASUI, TOSHIYOSHI FUJIWARA
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background/Aim:</h3> The Cirrhosis Outcome Risk Estimator (CORE) score is a novel model designed to predict the risk of liver disease. However, data regarding the prognostic utility of the CORE score in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) remain scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the CORE score as a prognostic stratification tool for R-PDAC. <h3>Patients and Methods:</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 242 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for R-PDAC between January 2009 and December 2023. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their preoperative CORE scores. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), comparing perioperative outcomes between the groups. <h3>Results:</h3> Of the 242 patients, 73 (30.2%) were classified into the high CORE score group (score &gt;0.9). Patients in the high CORE score group exhibited significantly worse five-year RFS (18.0% <i>vs.</i> 40.1%, <i>p</i>=0.001) and OS (25.9% <i>vs.</i> 51.0%, <i>p</i>=0.001) than those in the low CORE score group. Multivariate analyses identified a low CORE score as an independent predictor of RFS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.53, <i>p</i>=0.014] and OS (HR=1.70, <i>p</i>=0.004). <h3>Conclusion:</h3> The CORE score is a robust, simple preoperative predictor of survival following pancreatectomy for R-PDAC.

In VivoVol. 40(4)
Okayama University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.