Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations

Deception is an important social behavior because it can shape another person's choices while concealing the sender's true interests. Although people often respond differently when trying to gain rewards or avoid losses, it remains unclear how these contexts influence the shared brain processes that support deception during real interaction. Here we show that loss contexts make deception more frequent and more successful in human face-to-face communication. We study same-gender stranger dyads (18 female dyads) while sender gives recommendations that can either help or mislead the other under gain and loss contexts. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record brain activity from both people at the same time, we find that misleading recommendations in gain contexts are associated with stronger activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a frontal brain region involved in control and planning. In contrast, successful deception in loss contexts is associated with higher interpersonal brain synchrony in this region, defined as a greater increase in similarity between the two people's brain activity during interaction compared with rest. This synchrony predicts deception success, suggesting that deception depends on context-sensitive alignment between interacting brains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-10577-2
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations

H T Wang, Yingjie Liu, Rui Huang, Xiaowei Gao et al.
Communications Biology
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations

H T Wang, Yingjie Liu, Rui Huang, Xiaowei Gao, Jingao Zhang, Yuhao Jia, Yaozhong Liu, Jingyao Zheng
article en

Abstract

Deception is an important social behavior because it can shape another person's choices while concealing the sender's true interests. Although people often respond differently when trying to gain rewards or avoid losses, it remains unclear how these contexts influence the shared brain processes that support deception during real interaction. Here we show that loss contexts make deception more frequent and more successful in human face-to-face communication. We study same-gender stranger dyads (18 female dyads) while sender gives recommendations that can either help or mislead the other under gain and loss contexts. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record brain activity from both people at the same time, we find that misleading recommendations in gain contexts are associated with stronger activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a frontal brain region involved in control and planning. In contrast, successful deception in loss contexts is associated with higher interpersonal brain synchrony in this region, defined as a greater increase in similarity between the two people's brain activity during interaction compared with rest. This synchrony predicts deception success, suggesting that deception depends on context-sensitive alignment between interacting brains.

Communications Biology
North China University of Science and Technology (CN), Hebei University of Science and Technology (CN), Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN), Hebei Mental Health Center (CN)
Department of Education of Hebei Province, Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.