Vigilant Monitoring: Is there a Subset of Stable Patients with Intussusception in Children That Requires No Intervention? A Retrospective Observational Study

The minimal interventions are widely used and practiced for over five decades and encompass reduction techniques such as USGor fluoroscopy-guided saline enema/USG-guided pneumatic reduction. [4][5]5][6] However, if there is a possibility of a subset of patients who undergo spontaneous reduction, identifying them is of paramount importance, as any intervention, even minimal, has its complications.Therefore, defining or finding such a subset could help avoid unnecessary interventions.Although a spontaneous reduction rate ranging between 0.3 and 14% has been described in various previous studies, 7 they fail to mention the criteria that can help us define such a subset.Our study, thus, attempts to explain the subset with the help of a few criteria, which might help us select patients who can be kept under vigilant monitoring and therefore avoid interventions of any form. What i s KnoWn?• Ultrasonography (USG) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of intussusception.• In idiopathic intussusception, once confirmed, we go ahead with minimally invasive pneumatic reduction/hydrostatic reduction.• In failed reductions, exploration is needed.• No role of conservative management as of now. What i s neW?• To identify a subset of patients with idiopathic intussusception in whom spontaneous reduction without intervention is possible.• To try to define criteria for such a subset. introductionTelescoping of a segment of the intestine into its distal segment is described as intussusception. 1 Based on the segments involved, intussusceptions are broadly grouped into: jejunojejunal, ileoileal, ileocolic, colo-colic types, and a complex ileo-ileo-colic variant. 2 Among these groups, the ileo-colic type is encountered more often, accounting for up to 90%. 3 Around 80-90% of the cases are usually idiopathic with no specific attributable cause. [2][3]3][4] There is a significant proportion of intussusceptions, especially the small bowel intussusceptions, which undergo spontaneous resolution.However, if the size of the target sign is large, if there is a lead point, and if there are signs of ischemic changes on USG, then surgical exploration is needed. 5The management approach consists of both surgical interventions and minimally invasive interventions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Academics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-11003-0209
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vigilant Monitoring: Is there a Subset of Stable Patients with Intussusception in Children That Requires No Intervention? A Retrospective Observational Study

Aditya J. J Baindur, Ramesh Tanger, Nagashri BS
Journal of Medical Academics
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
article

Vigilant Monitoring: Is there a Subset of Stable Patients with Intussusception in Children That Requires No Intervention? A Retrospective Observational Study

Aditya J. J Baindur, Ramesh Tanger, Nagashri BS
article en

Abstract

The minimal interventions are widely used and practiced for over five decades and encompass reduction techniques such as USGor fluoroscopy-guided saline enema/USG-guided pneumatic reduction. [4][5]5][6] However, if there is a possibility of a subset of patients who undergo spontaneous reduction, identifying them is of paramount importance, as any intervention, even minimal, has its complications.Therefore, defining or finding such a subset could help avoid unnecessary interventions.Although a spontaneous reduction rate ranging between 0.3 and 14% has been described in various previous studies, 7 they fail to mention the criteria that can help us define such a subset.Our study, thus, attempts to explain the subset with the help of a few criteria, which might help us select patients who can be kept under vigilant monitoring and therefore avoid interventions of any form. What i s KnoWn?• Ultrasonography (USG) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of intussusception.• In idiopathic intussusception, once confirmed, we go ahead with minimally invasive pneumatic reduction/hydrostatic reduction.• In failed reductions, exploration is needed.• No role of conservative management as of now. What i s neW?• To identify a subset of patients with idiopathic intussusception in whom spontaneous reduction without intervention is possible.• To try to define criteria for such a subset. introductionTelescoping of a segment of the intestine into its distal segment is described as intussusception. 1 Based on the segments involved, intussusceptions are broadly grouped into: jejunojejunal, ileoileal, ileocolic, colo-colic types, and a complex ileo-ileo-colic variant. 2 Among these groups, the ileo-colic type is encountered more often, accounting for up to 90%. 3 Around 80-90% of the cases are usually idiopathic with no specific attributable cause. [2][3]3][4] There is a significant proportion of intussusceptions, especially the small bowel intussusceptions, which undergo spontaneous resolution.However, if the size of the target sign is large, if there is a lead point, and if there are signs of ischemic changes on USG, then surgical exploration is needed. 5The management approach consists of both surgical interventions and minimally invasive interventions.

Journal of Medical AcademicsVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.