Large Language Models as Explainable AI Ensemble Aggregators for Business Review Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study with Classical Ensembles

Online business reviews encode rich customer sentiment that is critical for commercial decision making, yet accurately predicting star ratings from free text remains a challenging five-class classification problem. Classical ensemble methods—Soft Voting, Weighted Voting, and Stacking—aggregate complementary base-model outputs to improve predictive performance, but they produce opaque decisions that are unintelligible to business stakeholders. This paper proposes using a large language model (LLM), specifically unsloth/LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct, as an Explainable AI (XAI) ensemble aggregator: the LLM receives the predictions and confidence scores of four heterogeneous base models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and BERT-base-uncased) and reasons over them to produce both a final star-rating prediction and a natural-language explanation. We evaluate the full pipeline on 10,000-sample balanced and natural-distribution test sets derived from the Yelp Academic Dataset, with additional cross-lingual validation on Spanish Amazon Reviews. The LLM aggregator (LLAMA_AGG) achieves the highest macro-F1 on both pipelines (0.6800 on balanced; 0.6720 on natural) and the best ordinal calibration (QWK = 0.9111 on balanced; 0.9337 on natural), outperforming all classical aggregators and base models. A detailed Explainable AI analysis reveals that the LLM revises 28.07% of its standalone predictions after observing the ensemble outputs, improving the accuracy by +22.2 percentage points on the revised cases. The aggregator corrects severe polar bias in the standalone LLM (±0.35 recall improvement on mid-range star classes) and produces longer explanations when evidence is conflicted—a quantitative signal of deliberative reasoning. A formal human evaluation with two judges confirms high explanation faithfulness (4.47/5) and readability (4.82/5). Model scale ablation shows an 8B parameter variant achieves 90.8% agreement with the 70B model, enabling practical deployment. These findings demonstrate that Explainable AI can be achieved through LLM-based ensemble aggregation, establishing a principled approach for business-review sentiment analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136479
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Models as Explainable AI Ensemble Aggregators for Business Review Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study with Classical Ensembles

Dimitris Spiliotopoulos, Dionisis Margaris, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Costas Vassilakis
Applied Sciences
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Large Language Models as Explainable AI Ensemble Aggregators for Business Review Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study with Classical Ensembles

Dimitris Spiliotopoulos, Dionisis Margaris, Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis, Costas Vassilakis
article en

Abstract

Online business reviews encode rich customer sentiment that is critical for commercial decision making, yet accurately predicting star ratings from free text remains a challenging five-class classification problem. Classical ensemble methods—Soft Voting, Weighted Voting, and Stacking—aggregate complementary base-model outputs to improve predictive performance, but they produce opaque decisions that are unintelligible to business stakeholders. This paper proposes using a large language model (LLM), specifically unsloth/LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct, as an Explainable AI (XAI) ensemble aggregator: the LLM receives the predictions and confidence scores of four heterogeneous base models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, and BERT-base-uncased) and reasons over them to produce both a final star-rating prediction and a natural-language explanation. We evaluate the full pipeline on 10,000-sample balanced and natural-distribution test sets derived from the Yelp Academic Dataset, with additional cross-lingual validation on Spanish Amazon Reviews. The LLM aggregator (LLAMA_AGG) achieves the highest macro-F1 on both pipelines (0.6800 on balanced; 0.6720 on natural) and the best ordinal calibration (QWK = 0.9111 on balanced; 0.9337 on natural), outperforming all classical aggregators and base models. A detailed Explainable AI analysis reveals that the LLM revises 28.07% of its standalone predictions after observing the ensemble outputs, improving the accuracy by +22.2 percentage points on the revised cases. The aggregator corrects severe polar bias in the standalone LLM (±0.35 recall improvement on mid-range star classes) and produces longer explanations when evidence is conflicted—a quantitative signal of deliberative reasoning. A formal human evaluation with two judges confirms high explanation faithfulness (4.47/5) and readability (4.82/5). Model scale ablation shows an 8B parameter variant achieves 90.8% agreement with the 70B model, enabling practical deployment. These findings demonstrate that Explainable AI can be achieved through LLM-based ensemble aggregation, establishing a principled approach for business-review sentiment analysis.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(13)
University of Peloponnese (GR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.