AI-Enabled Drug Discovery Platforms: Navigating the Confluence of Software, Medical Device, and Pharmaceutical Regulation in Sino-African Trade Relations

The integration of artificial intelligence into drug discovery platforms presents a fundamental challenge to established regulatory taxonomies worldwide, raising a deceptively simple question with profound implications: Should AI-enabled drug discovery platforms be regulated as software, as medical devices, or as pharmaceuticals? This article examines this regulatory trilemma through the dual lens of comparative global frameworks and Sino-African trade relations. The analysis reveals that major jurisdictions—including the United States, European Union, and China—have adopted hybrid approaches that defy simple categorization, with the FDA emphasizing Predetermined Change Control Plans for adaptive algorithms, the EU layering AI Act requirements atop Medical Device Regulation frameworks, and China advancing a specialized AI medical device guidance architecture. For African regulatory environments, where the African Medicines Agency is newly operational and most National Regulatory Authorities function at WHO Maturity Level 3, this global fragmentation presents both peril and opportunity. The article argues that China's emergence as a leading developer of AI-enabled drug discovery technologies, combined with its deepening pharmaceutical trade relationships across Africa under FOCAC frameworks, creates unprecedented possibilities for regulatory leapfrogging through Sino-African cooperation. By examining trade patterns, investment flows, and capacity-building initiatives, this research demonstrates that the regulatory classification question is not merely a technical matter of legal taxonomy but a strategic determinant of market access, technology transfer, and ultimately, health equity across the African continent. The article concludes with concrete recommendations for harmonized approaches, South-South regulatory cooperation mechanisms, and African-specific adaptation of global AI governance principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Yildiz Social Science Review
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51803/yssr.1937910
Primary Topic
Global Health and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Enabled Drug Discovery Platforms: Navigating the Confluence of Software, Medical Device, and Pharmaceutical Regulation in Sino-African Trade Relations

Sema Yılmaz Genç, Klemens Katterbauer, Rahmi Deniz Özbay
Yildiz Social Science Review
Global Health and Surgery
article

AI-Enabled Drug Discovery Platforms: Navigating the Confluence of Software, Medical Device, and Pharmaceutical Regulation in Sino-African Trade Relations

Sema Yılmaz Genç, Klemens Katterbauer, Rahmi Deniz Özbay
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into drug discovery platforms presents a fundamental challenge to established regulatory taxonomies worldwide, raising a deceptively simple question with profound implications: Should AI-enabled drug discovery platforms be regulated as software, as medical devices, or as pharmaceuticals? This article examines this regulatory trilemma through the dual lens of comparative global frameworks and Sino-African trade relations. The analysis reveals that major jurisdictions—including the United States, European Union, and China—have adopted hybrid approaches that defy simple categorization, with the FDA emphasizing Predetermined Change Control Plans for adaptive algorithms, the EU layering AI Act requirements atop Medical Device Regulation frameworks, and China advancing a specialized AI medical device guidance architecture. For African regulatory environments, where the African Medicines Agency is newly operational and most National Regulatory Authorities function at WHO Maturity Level 3, this global fragmentation presents both peril and opportunity. The article argues that China's emergence as a leading developer of AI-enabled drug discovery technologies, combined with its deepening pharmaceutical trade relationships across Africa under FOCAC frameworks, creates unprecedented possibilities for regulatory leapfrogging through Sino-African cooperation. By examining trade patterns, investment flows, and capacity-building initiatives, this research demonstrates that the regulatory classification question is not merely a technical matter of legal taxonomy but a strategic determinant of market access, technology transfer, and ultimately, health equity across the African continent. The article concludes with concrete recommendations for harmonized approaches, South-South regulatory cooperation mechanisms, and African-specific adaptation of global AI governance principles.

Yildiz Social Science ReviewVol. 12(1)
Euclid University (GM), Yıldız Technical University (TR), Istanbul Commerce University (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global Health and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.