Co-Producing Surveillance: Technology, Law, and State–Society Relations in Asia

Amid the global intensification of surveillance through digital and biometric technologies, this review conceptualizes surveillance as the coproduction of law, technology, and state–society relations. Examining cases from China, India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, it develops a spectrum of techno-legal coproduction shaped by the degree of alignment or contestation between law and technology. At one end, authoritarian synergy integrates legal and technological systems to consolidate control; at the other, rights-bounded contestation in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan constrains surveillance through legal safeguards, judicial oversight, and civic activism. India and Singapore occupy hybrid middle positions. Across these contexts, surveillance emerges through dynamic interactions among state, corporate, and civic actors. Future research should extend this comparative framework to additional Asian contexts and explore the transnational dimensions of surveillance, including the diffusion and hybridization of legal norms, the circulation of technologies and governance models, and the emergence of transnational networks of resistance and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-042224-094457
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Producing Surveillance: Technology, Law, and State–Society Relations in Asia

Ya-Wen Lei, Ching-Fu Lin
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Co-Producing Surveillance: Technology, Law, and State–Society Relations in Asia

Ya-Wen Lei, Ching-Fu Lin
article en

Abstract

Amid the global intensification of surveillance through digital and biometric technologies, this review conceptualizes surveillance as the coproduction of law, technology, and state–society relations. Examining cases from China, India, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, it develops a spectrum of techno-legal coproduction shaped by the degree of alignment or contestation between law and technology. At one end, authoritarian synergy integrates legal and technological systems to consolidate control; at the other, rights-bounded contestation in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan constrains surveillance through legal safeguards, judicial oversight, and civic activism. India and Singapore occupy hybrid middle positions. Across these contexts, surveillance emerges through dynamic interactions among state, corporate, and civic actors. Future research should extend this comparative framework to additional Asian contexts and explore the transnational dimensions of surveillance, including the diffusion and hybridization of legal norms, the circulation of technologies and governance models, and the emergence of transnational networks of resistance and accountability.

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
National Tsing Hua University (TW), Harvard University Press (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.