Photonic band Gap-Based different slot patch antenna with Machine learning Verification for Wi-Fi 5/6

This paper introduces a compact photonic band gap (PBG)-based different-slot microstrip patch antenna (MPA) designed for Wi-Fi 5/6 applications at 5.5 GHz. The design has three electromagnetic features all in one structure: a pentagonal PBG built into the substrate, a defected ground structure (DGS) in the ground plane, and a circular slot in the radiating patch. The goal is to make the impedance matching, gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency better while keeping the size at 30 × 30 mm 2 . The 5.5 GHz frequency is chosen because it is important for WLAN operation in the 5 GHz Wi-Fi band, where routers, access points, and small Internet of Things (IoT) devices need low-profile antennas with stable broadside radiation. The last antenna has a resonance frequency of 5.5 GHz, a scattering parameter (S 11 ) value of −31.70 dB, a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of 1.03, a gain of 6.99 dB, a directivity of 7.44 dBi, and a radiation efficiency of 90.17 %. A machine learning (ML) stage was then used as a quick way to check the validity of the design instead of replacing the electromagnetic design. The input features were the antenna’s main geometric variables, such as the dimensions of the patch, feed, PBG arm, DGS, and slot radius. The target variables were gain and radiation efficiency. There were 626 CST-generated samples and 20 % test samples in the dataset. The predictive results are viewed as high-fidelity surrogate validation rather than proof of universal generalisation because the data were based on simulations and were small. XGBoost gave the best efficiency prediction (R 2 = 0.880, RMSE = 0.062, MAE = 0.021), and Random Forest Regression gave the best gain prediction (R 2 = 0.766, RMSE = 0.058, and MAE = 0.019). For the k-fold cross-validation of the dataset, five separate subsets (5-fold) were created to confirm that results were reliable and reproducible. The results together show that the proposed antenna works well with Wi-Fi 5/6 and that using machine learning to check designs can cut down on the number of times they need to be redesigned in future optimisation workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2026.102456
Primary Topic
Antenna Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photonic band Gap-Based different slot patch antenna with Machine learning Verification for Wi-Fi 5/6

Mohammad Shuhrawardy, Mohammad A. Alim, Bashir Ahammed, Rayhanur Rahaman
Engineering Science and Technology an International Journal
Antenna Design and Analysis
article

Photonic band Gap-Based different slot patch antenna with Machine learning Verification for Wi-Fi 5/6

Mohammad Shuhrawardy, Mohammad A. Alim, Bashir Ahammed, Rayhanur Rahaman
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a compact photonic band gap (PBG)-based different-slot microstrip patch antenna (MPA) designed for Wi-Fi 5/6 applications at 5.5 GHz. The design has three electromagnetic features all in one structure: a pentagonal PBG built into the substrate, a defected ground structure (DGS) in the ground plane, and a circular slot in the radiating patch. The goal is to make the impedance matching, gain, directivity, and radiation efficiency better while keeping the size at 30 × 30 mm 2 . The 5.5 GHz frequency is chosen because it is important for WLAN operation in the 5 GHz Wi-Fi band, where routers, access points, and small Internet of Things (IoT) devices need low-profile antennas with stable broadside radiation. The last antenna has a resonance frequency of 5.5 GHz, a scattering parameter (S 11 ) value of −31.70 dB, a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) of 1.03, a gain of 6.99 dB, a directivity of 7.44 dBi, and a radiation efficiency of 90.17 %. A machine learning (ML) stage was then used as a quick way to check the validity of the design instead of replacing the electromagnetic design. The input features were the antenna’s main geometric variables, such as the dimensions of the patch, feed, PBG arm, DGS, and slot radius. The target variables were gain and radiation efficiency. There were 626 CST-generated samples and 20 % test samples in the dataset. The predictive results are viewed as high-fidelity surrogate validation rather than proof of universal generalisation because the data were based on simulations and were small. XGBoost gave the best efficiency prediction (R 2 = 0.880, RMSE = 0.062, MAE = 0.021), and Random Forest Regression gave the best gain prediction (R 2 = 0.766, RMSE = 0.058, and MAE = 0.019). For the k-fold cross-validation of the dataset, five separate subsets (5-fold) were created to confirm that results were reliable and reproducible. The results together show that the proposed antenna works well with Wi-Fi 5/6 and that using machine learning to check designs can cut down on the number of times they need to be redesigned in future optimisation workflows.

Engineering Science and Technology an International JournalVol. 80
University of Chittagong (BD)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Antenna Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.