Exercise and nutritional prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer patients: prospective controlled trial assessing feasibility, safety and effects on quality of life

BACKGROUND: Perioperative morbidity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is closely associated with reduced physical fitness and impaired nutritional status. While prehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), it is not yet standard of care and remains underexplored in other GI malignancies. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise program combined with nutritional counseling in a cohort of GI cancer patients scheduled for surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, two-arm, controlled trial, patients scheduled for GI cancer surgery were assigned to a prehabilitation program (2-3 sessions/week ≥ 3 weeks, endurance and resistance training with nutritional counseling) or usual care. Primary endpoints were feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, acceptance, retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events). Secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 global score, SF-36 physical and mental health component scores, PCS, MCS), assessed at baseline (t0), presurgery (t1), hospital discharge (t2), and 12-week follow-up (t3). RESULTS: Among the 400 patients assessed for eligibility, 36% met the eligibility criteria. Of those approached, 41% consented to participate, resulting in an overall recruitment rate of 27% (n = 38). Of the recruited patients, 84% completed the study (n = 32; prehabilitation = 17; usual care = 15; mean age 63.5 years, range 38-85; ICD-10 C15-C26). Participants attended 95% of the planned sessions (8.1 ± 3.6) within a mean of 30 days (SD ± 16) and completed 59% at the target intensity. Nutritional counseling was provided to 94% of the patients. No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. A modest improvement in PCS was observed in the prehabilitation group at t1 (+ 4.25 points), although this finding reached statistical significance only in the one-tailed analysis. No between-group differences were observed for global QoL or MCS. CONCLUSION: Multimodal prehabilitation combining supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise with nutritional counseling is feasible and safe in a real-world GI cancer population. Recruitment and achievement of prescribed training intensity remain key challenges. Preliminary findings indicate short-term benefits for physical health, supporting further investigations in larger randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00028728; prospectively registered 05/05/2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16435-y
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exercise and nutritional prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer patients: prospective controlled trial assessing feasibility, safety and effects on quality of life

Antonia Pahl, Hartmut Bertz, Christine Greil, Hannes Neeff et al.
BMC Cancer
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Exercise and nutritional prehabilitation in gastrointestinal cancer patients: prospective controlled trial assessing feasibility, safety and effects on quality of life

Antonia Pahl, Hartmut Bertz, Christine Greil, Hannes Neeff, Gabriel Seifert, Freerk T. Baumann, Cécile Weiß, Laurie Assenbaum
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative morbidity in gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is closely associated with reduced physical fitness and impaired nutritional status. While prehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), it is not yet standard of care and remains underexplored in other GI malignancies. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of a supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise program combined with nutritional counseling in a cohort of GI cancer patients scheduled for surgery. METHODS: In a prospective, two-arm, controlled trial, patients scheduled for GI cancer surgery were assigned to a prehabilitation program (2-3 sessions/week ≥ 3 weeks, endurance and resistance training with nutritional counseling) or usual care. Primary endpoints were feasibility (eligibility, recruitment, acceptance, retention, adherence) and safety (adverse events). Secondary endpoint was quality of life (QoL; EORTC QLQ-C30 global score, SF-36 physical and mental health component scores, PCS, MCS), assessed at baseline (t0), presurgery (t1), hospital discharge (t2), and 12-week follow-up (t3). RESULTS: Among the 400 patients assessed for eligibility, 36% met the eligibility criteria. Of those approached, 41% consented to participate, resulting in an overall recruitment rate of 27% (n = 38). Of the recruited patients, 84% completed the study (n = 32; prehabilitation = 17; usual care = 15; mean age 63.5 years, range 38-85; ICD-10 C15-C26). Participants attended 95% of the planned sessions (8.1 ± 3.6) within a mean of 30 days (SD ± 16) and completed 59% at the target intensity. Nutritional counseling was provided to 94% of the patients. No intervention-related serious adverse events occurred. A modest improvement in PCS was observed in the prehabilitation group at t1 (+ 4.25 points), although this finding reached statistical significance only in the one-tailed analysis. No between-group differences were observed for global QoL or MCS. CONCLUSION: Multimodal prehabilitation combining supervised moderate-to-high intensity exercise with nutritional counseling is feasible and safe in a real-world GI cancer population. Recruitment and achievement of prescribed training intensity remain key challenges. Preliminary findings indicate short-term benefits for physical health, supporting further investigations in larger randomized trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00028728; prospectively registered 05/05/2022.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
University of Freiburg (DE), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Integrated Oncology (United States) (US), Diakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.