Remedial interventions in mathematics education at the secondary school level: a systematic review of the literature

This systematic review synthesises findings from 51 empirical studies on remedial mathematics interventions at the secondary school level. The review analyses interventions across five dimensions: target student population, mathematical content, adaptivity, efficacy, and integration of digital technology. The findings reveal a strong emphasis on foundational skills, particularly arithmetic, algebra, and word problems, with little attention to geometry, statistics, or higher-level mathematical reasoning. Most interventions adopt highly structured and pre-scripted designs, offering limited adaptivity to students’ evolving needs. Digital technologies are incorporated in fewer than half of the studies and primarily support procedural learning through video modelling or intelligent tutoring systems, rather than conceptual understanding. Although many interventions report positive short-term outcomes, evidence of long-term effectiveness and responsiveness to learner diversity remains limited. Overall, the review highlights the need for more flexible, theoretically grounded, and technology-enhanced remedial interventions that address conceptual sense-making and support diverse learners within inclusive secondary school contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Mathematics Education
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2026.2689905
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remedial interventions in mathematics education at the secondary school level: a systematic review of the literature

Federica Poli, Anna Baccaglini‐Frank, Giulia Lisarelli, Cristina Poli
Research in Mathematics Education
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Remedial interventions in mathematics education at the secondary school level: a systematic review of the literature

Federica Poli, Anna Baccaglini‐Frank, Giulia Lisarelli, Cristina Poli
article en

Abstract

This systematic review synthesises findings from 51 empirical studies on remedial mathematics interventions at the secondary school level. The review analyses interventions across five dimensions: target student population, mathematical content, adaptivity, efficacy, and integration of digital technology. The findings reveal a strong emphasis on foundational skills, particularly arithmetic, algebra, and word problems, with little attention to geometry, statistics, or higher-level mathematical reasoning. Most interventions adopt highly structured and pre-scripted designs, offering limited adaptivity to students’ evolving needs. Digital technologies are incorporated in fewer than half of the studies and primarily support procedural learning through video modelling or intelligent tutoring systems, rather than conceptual understanding. Although many interventions report positive short-term outcomes, evidence of long-term effectiveness and responsiveness to learner diversity remains limited. Overall, the review highlights the need for more flexible, theoretically grounded, and technology-enhanced remedial interventions that address conceptual sense-making and support diverse learners within inclusive secondary school contexts.

Research in Mathematics Education
University of Pisa (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.