Dual age identity

Social groups and categories are fundamental to how individuals understand themselves and others across the life span. The model of the dual age identity proposes that individuals hold two interrelated identities: (a) a fluid age-group identity that shifts as people grow older (e.g., teenager, young, middle-aged, and old people) and (b) a more enduring, permanent generational identity tied to shared historical experiences (e.g., Greatest Generation; Baby Boomer; Generation X; Millennials; Generation Z). These two identities often have opposing psychological consequences. As individuals age, they often distance themselves from older adults in response to negative age stereotypes, while simultaneously increasing their identification with their generation, which represents a psychological resource. In this review, we synthesize emerging evidence on dual age identity from two complementary perspectives: (1) an intragroup perspective conceptualizing generational identification as a resource for agency, continuity, and well-being, and (2) an intergroup perspective that highlights how relations between generations shape identity formation and intergenerational perceptions. Together, this research provides new insights into how dual age identity develops, when it becomes salient, and why it matters for development and aging, highlighting how individuals adapt to aging-related change and understand their social place in a rapidly-changing world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developmental Review
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2026.101283
Primary Topic
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual age identity

William J. Chopik, David Weiss
Developmental Review
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
article

Dual age identity

William J. Chopik, David Weiss
article en

Abstract

Social groups and categories are fundamental to how individuals understand themselves and others across the life span. The model of the dual age identity proposes that individuals hold two interrelated identities: (a) a fluid age-group identity that shifts as people grow older (e.g., teenager, young, middle-aged, and old people) and (b) a more enduring, permanent generational identity tied to shared historical experiences (e.g., Greatest Generation; Baby Boomer; Generation X; Millennials; Generation Z). These two identities often have opposing psychological consequences. As individuals age, they often distance themselves from older adults in response to negative age stereotypes, while simultaneously increasing their identification with their generation, which represents a psychological resource. In this review, we synthesize emerging evidence on dual age identity from two complementary perspectives: (1) an intragroup perspective conceptualizing generational identification as a resource for agency, continuity, and well-being, and (2) an intergroup perspective that highlights how relations between generations shape identity formation and intergenerational perceptions. Together, this research provides new insights into how dual age identity develops, when it becomes salient, and why it matters for development and aging, highlighting how individuals adapt to aging-related change and understand their social place in a rapidly-changing world.

Developmental ReviewVol. 81
Washington University in St. Louis (US), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.