Bioaccessibility of metals in food supplements: protocols and facts

Abstract This study evaluated the bioaccessibility of essential (Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na and Zn) and non-essential (Al, Ba, Cr, Sr and V) elements in food supplements (vitamins and/or minerals and botanicals). Extraction using in-vitro methods (Unified BARGE Method—UBM and INFOGEST) was evaluated allowing a comparison of protocols and using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). Bioaccessibility values revealed differences among the elements in different types of food supplements. The limits of quantification (LOQs) obtained for some elements were relatively high for both methods due to the composition of the digests, which drastically impaired bioaccessibility assessment. As a result, most elements presented fractions lower than the LOQ, regardless of the sample. This is an important limitation promoted by interferences when analyzing these extracts by ICP-based techniques. A simple extraction using 1 mol L −1 HCl was evaluated, considering that HCl is present in the solutions used in both protocols. Leaching was observed for the same elements using only the HCl solution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioMetals
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10534-026-00844-4
Primary Topic
Heavy Metals in Plants
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bioaccessibility of metals in food supplements: protocols and facts

Gustavo R. Bitencourt, Rodrigo Cordeiro Bolzan, Rochele S. Picoloto, Thaís dos Santos Berón et al.
BioMetals
Heavy Metals in Plants
article

Bioaccessibility of metals in food supplements: protocols and facts

Gustavo R. Bitencourt, Rodrigo Cordeiro Bolzan, Rochele S. Picoloto, Thaís dos Santos Berón, Paola Azevedo Mello
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluated the bioaccessibility of essential (Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na and Zn) and non-essential (Al, Ba, Cr, Sr and V) elements in food supplements (vitamins and/or minerals and botanicals). Extraction using in-vitro methods (Unified BARGE Method—UBM and INFOGEST) was evaluated allowing a comparison of protocols and using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES). Bioaccessibility values revealed differences among the elements in different types of food supplements. The limits of quantification (LOQs) obtained for some elements were relatively high for both methods due to the composition of the digests, which drastically impaired bioaccessibility assessment. As a result, most elements presented fractions lower than the LOQ, regardless of the sample. This is an important limitation promoted by interferences when analyzing these extracts by ICP-based techniques. A simple extraction using 1 mol L −1 HCl was evaluated, considering that HCl is present in the solutions used in both protocols. Leaching was observed for the same elements using only the HCl solution.

BioMetals
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Heavy Metals in Plants
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.