How Law Matters Now: Laura Nader's Humanistic Empiricism and Where Legal Anthropology Goes From Here

Given the troubling state of law and democracy today, we are in an important moment to consider the unique contributions that legal anthropology and closely related fields provide to studying the lived practices of human meaning-making in moments of conflict and the politics of their resolution. This overview of those fields occurs on the sixtieth anniversary of two famous symposia convened by Professor Laura Nader that dramatically shifted the direction of the subfield of legal anthropology, a development we briefly review along with contributions of other earlier scholars. Turning to recent scholarship in legal anthropology, we examine how newer research moves forward from those roots, alongside research gathered under the rubric of New Legal Realism. These studies document law's irreducibly ideational and material dimensions, demonstrating the need for a humanistic empiricism in legal studies. We suggest that social science and legal scholarship should collaborate in exploring the normative universes in which social groups operate, staying open to studying the “ought” as well as the “is.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-062124-122115
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Law Matters Now: Laura Nader's Humanistic Empiricism and Where Legal Anthropology Goes From Here

Justin B. Richland, Elizabeth Mertz
Annual Review of Law and Social Science
Law in Society and Culture
article

How Law Matters Now: Laura Nader's Humanistic Empiricism and Where Legal Anthropology Goes From Here

Justin B. Richland, Elizabeth Mertz
article en

Abstract

Given the troubling state of law and democracy today, we are in an important moment to consider the unique contributions that legal anthropology and closely related fields provide to studying the lived practices of human meaning-making in moments of conflict and the politics of their resolution. This overview of those fields occurs on the sixtieth anniversary of two famous symposia convened by Professor Laura Nader that dramatically shifted the direction of the subfield of legal anthropology, a development we briefly review along with contributions of other earlier scholars. Turning to recent scholarship in legal anthropology, we examine how newer research moves forward from those roots, alongside research gathered under the rubric of New Legal Realism. These studies document law's irreducibly ideational and material dimensions, demonstrating the need for a humanistic empiricism in legal studies. We suggest that social science and legal scholarship should collaborate in exploring the normative universes in which social groups operate, staying open to studying the “ought” as well as the “is.”

Annual Review of Law and Social Science
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.