Measuring attitudes toward death and dying among adult intensive care unit staff: A systematic review of assessment tools

PURPOSE: Attitudes toward death and dying are central to intensive care unit (ICU) culture, influencing communication, ethical decision-making, moral distress and professional identity. Yet how these attitudes are measured in adult ICU clinicians, and the robustness of available instruments, remains unclear. We systematically reviewed tools used to assess attitudes toward death and dying in adult ICU staff. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidance and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420250527706). Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus were searched from January 1980 to December 2024. Original peer-reviewed studies using named quantitative instruments in adult ICU clinicians were included. Study selection was undertaken independently by three reviewers. Measurement properties were appraised using COSMIN criteria, and methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Given substantial heterogeneity in constructs and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies reporting eleven primary instruments were included, predominantly involving ICU nurses and cross-sectional designs. Instruments addressed diverse constructs, including caring attitudes, perceived barriers to end-of-life care, ethical sensitivity, organisational values and treatment decision-making. Several tools demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and construct validity. Overall methodological quality was moderate to high, although sampling representativeness and non-response bias were frequently unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Current instruments provide fragmented and conceptually divergent assessments of ICU clinicians' attitudes toward death and dying. Limited cross-cultural validation and poor evidence of responsiveness constrain their usefulness for evaluating interventions or supporting improvement. More coherent, implementation-ready measurement tools are needed to strengthen end-of-life culture in intensive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Care
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155659
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring attitudes toward death and dying among adult intensive care unit staff: A systematic review of assessment tools

Zoe Brummell, Victoria Metaxa, Timothy Bonnici, A. L. Georgiou et al.
Journal of Critical Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Measuring attitudes toward death and dying among adult intensive care unit staff: A systematic review of assessment tools

Zoe Brummell, Victoria Metaxa, Timothy Bonnici, A. L. Georgiou, Kate Williams
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Attitudes toward death and dying are central to intensive care unit (ICU) culture, influencing communication, ethical decision-making, moral distress and professional identity. Yet how these attitudes are measured in adult ICU clinicians, and the robustness of available instruments, remains unclear. We systematically reviewed tools used to assess attitudes toward death and dying in adult ICU staff. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA 2020 guidance and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420250527706). Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus were searched from January 1980 to December 2024. Original peer-reviewed studies using named quantitative instruments in adult ICU clinicians were included. Study selection was undertaken independently by three reviewers. Measurement properties were appraised using COSMIN criteria, and methodological quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Given substantial heterogeneity in constructs and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies reporting eleven primary instruments were included, predominantly involving ICU nurses and cross-sectional designs. Instruments addressed diverse constructs, including caring attitudes, perceived barriers to end-of-life care, ethical sensitivity, organisational values and treatment decision-making. Several tools demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and construct validity. Overall methodological quality was moderate to high, although sampling representativeness and non-response bias were frequently unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Current instruments provide fragmented and conceptually divergent assessments of ICU clinicians' attitudes toward death and dying. Limited cross-cultural validation and poor evidence of responsiveness constrain their usefulness for evaluating interventions or supporting improvement. More coherent, implementation-ready measurement tools are needed to strengthen end-of-life culture in intensive care.

Journal of Critical CareVol. 95
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.