Meta‐Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis

BACKGROUND: Partnering with people with lived experience of the mental health or substance use spectrum and caregivers is a growing priority in research. There is an emerging meta-research literature on the science of engagement, but this has not been synthesised. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review synthesises the meta-research on the science of lived experience and caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research. METHOD: We conducted systematic searches in PsycInfo (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science. Articles were eligible if they presented original meta-research on lived experience/caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research in the past 10 years. Titles and abstracts, then full texts, were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted into a spreadsheet and synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS: Fifty-seven articles were included. The meta-research has aimed to understand experiences or needs in engagement contexts, describe or evaluate engagement groups, or develop or evaluate tools and resources to support engagement. The literature reports on positive experiences and challenges, describes approaches and new tools, and highlights opportunities for increased engagement. Papers point to the importance of improving engagement processes, structural supports and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of meta-research on the science of lived experience and caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research remains largely descriptive in nature, rather than analytical. Research teams are encouraged to seek solutions to identified challenges and key areas of development in engagement processes, structural supports and logistics. Addressing these aspects will further advance the meta-research evidence base. LIVED EXPERIENCE: This review was conducted together with people with lived experience, including co-authorship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Expectations
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.70733
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta‐Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis

Abigail Amartey, Terri Rodak, Lisa D. Hawke, Hajar Seiyad et al.
Health Expectations
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Meta‐Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis

Abigail Amartey, Terri Rodak, Lisa D. Hawke, Hajar Seiyad, Joshua Orson, Joshua Dunphy, Shelby McKee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Partnering with people with lived experience of the mental health or substance use spectrum and caregivers is a growing priority in research. There is an emerging meta-research literature on the science of engagement, but this has not been synthesised. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review synthesises the meta-research on the science of lived experience and caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research. METHOD: We conducted systematic searches in PsycInfo (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and Web of Science. Articles were eligible if they presented original meta-research on lived experience/caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research in the past 10 years. Titles and abstracts, then full texts, were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted into a spreadsheet and synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS: Fifty-seven articles were included. The meta-research has aimed to understand experiences or needs in engagement contexts, describe or evaluate engagement groups, or develop or evaluate tools and resources to support engagement. The literature reports on positive experiences and challenges, describes approaches and new tools, and highlights opportunities for increased engagement. Papers point to the importance of improving engagement processes, structural supports and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of meta-research on the science of lived experience and caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research remains largely descriptive in nature, rather than analytical. Research teams are encouraged to seek solutions to identified challenges and key areas of development in engagement processes, structural supports and logistics. Addressing these aspects will further advance the meta-research evidence base. LIVED EXPERIENCE: This review was conducted together with people with lived experience, including co-authorship.

Health ExpectationsVol. 29(4)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.