The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to optimise robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation by closing the loop between user and device. Developing such systems requires reliable methods for classifying walking and its component phases to enable real-time feedback. However, research into electroencephalography (EEG)-based gait classification remains limited, with no consensus on optimal methodological or classification approaches. This scoping review aimed to identify (i) gait states and phases classified to date, (ii) methodological processes employed in gait and gait phase classification and (iii) classification systems used. A pre-registered scoping review was conducted. SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Studies investigating EEG-based gait or gait phase classification, with or without robotic assistance were included. From 15,915 unique studies, 62 were included. Ten studies classified gait phases, with most limited to two phases (n = 5). The majority involved treadmill walking (n = 8), with only two investigating overground walking. Only one study addressed gait phase classification (swing versus stance) during robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT), achieving a maximum accuracy of 83.06%. No studies investigated gait phase classification in a neurological population. Almost all gait phase studies used offline analysis (n = 9). One study performed online analysis, achieving an accuracy of 82.3% for swing versus stance classification. The remaining studies classified gait against other forms of movement. Sensorimotor area electrodes were most frequently used for classification and sensorimotor regions consistently exhibited gait-related discriminative EEG features. Collation of methodological processes identified little consensus within the field. Furthermore, classification accuracy was variable. This scoping review summarises EEG-based gait classification systems, highlighting the need for methodological consensus. Knowledge gaps include the classification of more than two gait phases during free overground walking and limited RAGT-based studies. Notably, gait phase classification research in neurological populations is entirely lacking. Addressing these gaps is critical to advance BCIs for gait rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02076-6
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review

Olive C. Lennon, Cormac Ryan, Conor White
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review

Olive C. Lennon, Cormac Ryan, Conor White
article en

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to optimise robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation by closing the loop between user and device. Developing such systems requires reliable methods for classifying walking and its component phases to enable real-time feedback. However, research into electroencephalography (EEG)-based gait classification remains limited, with no consensus on optimal methodological or classification approaches. This scoping review aimed to identify (i) gait states and phases classified to date, (ii) methodological processes employed in gait and gait phase classification and (iii) classification systems used. A pre-registered scoping review was conducted. SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Studies investigating EEG-based gait or gait phase classification, with or without robotic assistance were included. From 15,915 unique studies, 62 were included. Ten studies classified gait phases, with most limited to two phases (n = 5). The majority involved treadmill walking (n = 8), with only two investigating overground walking. Only one study addressed gait phase classification (swing versus stance) during robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT), achieving a maximum accuracy of 83.06%. No studies investigated gait phase classification in a neurological population. Almost all gait phase studies used offline analysis (n = 9). One study performed online analysis, achieving an accuracy of 82.3% for swing versus stance classification. The remaining studies classified gait against other forms of movement. Sensorimotor area electrodes were most frequently used for classification and sensorimotor regions consistently exhibited gait-related discriminative EEG features. Collation of methodological processes identified little consensus within the field. Furthermore, classification accuracy was variable. This scoping review summarises EEG-based gait classification systems, highlighting the need for methodological consensus. Knowledge gaps include the classification of more than two gait phases during free overground walking and limited RAGT-based studies. Notably, gait phase classification research in neurological populations is entirely lacking. Addressing these gaps is critical to advance BCIs for gait rehabilitation.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
University College Dublin (IE)
Science Foundation Ireland
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.