Advancing Historical Research Through AI and Data-Centric Approaches

The rapid digitization of large source collections in the humanities over the last three decades has comprehensively transformed the discipline. The accessibility of primary sources has improved drastically, the pre-processing of research data has been revolutionized in some areas, and new transdisciplinary approaches have emerged and become possible. However, while digital and computational historians have produced extensive reflection on these developments, the theoretical grounding of this transformation has not been fully integrated into mainstream historical methodology: most critically, the concept of ‘information’, central to computer science and computational methods, has not yet been systematically received as a technical category within the discipline’s methodological canon. In this contribution, we employ a concept from Science and Technology Studies—Bruno Latour’s ‘circulating reference’—to analyze and render describable the processes of historical research within a digitized research environment. Through three case studies—AI-supported segmentation of Habsburg cadastral maps (1817–1861), computational analysis of the Hof- und Staatsschematismus (1702–1918), and the datafication of the Munich Special Court archive inventory (1933–1945, 1975–1977)—we demonstrate how and at which specific points historical research benefits from this framework, and what new insights it enables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Histories
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/histories6030038
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Historical Research Through AI and Data-Centric Approaches

Malte Rehbein, Wolfgang Göderle, Markus Gerstmeier
Histories
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Advancing Historical Research Through AI and Data-Centric Approaches

Malte Rehbein, Wolfgang Göderle, Markus Gerstmeier
article en

Abstract

The rapid digitization of large source collections in the humanities over the last three decades has comprehensively transformed the discipline. The accessibility of primary sources has improved drastically, the pre-processing of research data has been revolutionized in some areas, and new transdisciplinary approaches have emerged and become possible. However, while digital and computational historians have produced extensive reflection on these developments, the theoretical grounding of this transformation has not been fully integrated into mainstream historical methodology: most critically, the concept of ‘information’, central to computer science and computational methods, has not yet been systematically received as a technical category within the discipline’s methodological canon. In this contribution, we employ a concept from Science and Technology Studies—Bruno Latour’s ‘circulating reference’—to analyze and render describable the processes of historical research within a digitized research environment. Through three case studies—AI-supported segmentation of Habsburg cadastral maps (1817–1861), computational analysis of the Hof- und Staatsschematismus (1702–1918), and the datafication of the Munich Special Court archive inventory (1933–1945, 1975–1977)—we demonstrate how and at which specific points historical research benefits from this framework, and what new insights it enables.

HistoriesVol. 6(3)
University of Passau (DE), Graz University of Technology (AT), Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (DE)
Austrian Science Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.