Two-Stage vs Single-Stage Ilizarov Application in High-Risk Patients: Impact on Early Complications and Resource Utilization

Background: Patients treated with an Ilizarov external fixator often feature risk factors that impair wound healing such as diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, obesity, and renal insufficiency. A 2-staged approach, with initial bony correction (Kirschner wire or hybrid) followed by delayed Ilizarov application by 5 days, is intended to support wound healing by allowing for reduction of soft tissue swelling and enhancing postoperative wound care. We hypothesized that this method is associated with fewer wound complications but increased use of resources. Methods: A retrospective review of 98 cases treated with an Ilizarov fixator (2004-2024) was conducted. Surgical management included 2-stage (n = 53, 54%) and single-stage (n = 45, 46%) procedures. Baseline characteristics and risk factors for compromised wound healing were recorded. Patients were stratified into 3 subgroups to enable comparative analysis: infection-related reconstructions (IRR), Charcot arthropathy (CA) and other applications. Preoperative presence of infection and ulceration was recorded. Primary endpoints were rates of impaired wound healing and wound revisions within 3 months post removal. Secondary endpoints were hospital length of stay after bony fixation, and total hospitalization costs. Results: Wound revision rates were significantly lower in the 2-stage group (9% vs 36%; OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-17.9; P = .0025) particularly in the CA subgroup (0% vs 38%; P = .010) or when an infection was present (14% vs 44%; OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2-22.3, P = .0138). Impaired wound healing was significantly lower in patients with a 2-stage procedure (30% vs 55%; OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P = .021). As an exploratory secondary outcome, no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay or total hospitalization costs was observed. Conclusion: Two-stage Ilizarov ring fixator application in high-risk foot and ankle surgery was associated with lower rates of impaired wound healing and wound revisions, particularly in CA and infection cases, without increasing hospital stay or costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle International
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261440490
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two-Stage vs Single-Stage Ilizarov Application in High-Risk Patients: Impact on Early Complications and Resource Utilization

Andreas Flury, Alexandros Tsolakidis, Flamur Zendeli, Carmen Castroviejo et al.
1 citations
Foot & Ankle International
Wound Healing and Treatments
7.28
article

Two-Stage vs Single-Stage Ilizarov Application in High-Risk Patients: Impact on Early Complications and Resource Utilization

Andreas Flury, Alexandros Tsolakidis, Flamur Zendeli, Carmen Castroviejo, Lukas Fischer, Stephan Wirth, Arnd Viehöfer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Patients treated with an Ilizarov external fixator often feature risk factors that impair wound healing such as diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, obesity, and renal insufficiency. A 2-staged approach, with initial bony correction (Kirschner wire or hybrid) followed by delayed Ilizarov application by 5 days, is intended to support wound healing by allowing for reduction of soft tissue swelling and enhancing postoperative wound care. We hypothesized that this method is associated with fewer wound complications but increased use of resources. Methods: A retrospective review of 98 cases treated with an Ilizarov fixator (2004-2024) was conducted. Surgical management included 2-stage (n = 53, 54%) and single-stage (n = 45, 46%) procedures. Baseline characteristics and risk factors for compromised wound healing were recorded. Patients were stratified into 3 subgroups to enable comparative analysis: infection-related reconstructions (IRR), Charcot arthropathy (CA) and other applications. Preoperative presence of infection and ulceration was recorded. Primary endpoints were rates of impaired wound healing and wound revisions within 3 months post removal. Secondary endpoints were hospital length of stay after bony fixation, and total hospitalization costs. Results: Wound revision rates were significantly lower in the 2-stage group (9% vs 36%; OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.8-17.9; P = .0025) particularly in the CA subgroup (0% vs 38%; P = .010) or when an infection was present (14% vs 44%; OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2-22.3, P = .0138). Impaired wound healing was significantly lower in patients with a 2-stage procedure (30% vs 55%; OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P = .021). As an exploratory secondary outcome, no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay or total hospitalization costs was observed. Conclusion: Two-stage Ilizarov ring fixator application in high-risk foot and ankle surgery was associated with lower rates of impaired wound healing and wound revisions, particularly in CA and infection cases, without increasing hospital stay or costs.

Foot & Ankle International
Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Wound Healing and Treatments
7.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.