Tracing a student’s covariational reasoning in constructing the diameter-circumference relationship

This study examines how a seventh-grade student coordinated circumference and diameter while constructing the relationship between these quantities. Conducted in two phases, a clinical interview and a task-based interview, the study drew on the student’s verbal responses, actions, and gestures. Clinical interview data were analysed descriptively, and task-based interview data through retrospective analysis. Findings showed that, although the student could carry out procedures involving circumference, he could not explain the reasoning underlying the formula π × d. During the task, he initially considered circumference and diameter separately, but later coordinated their corresponding changes. We recommend tasks that engage students in coordinating diameter and circumference as related quantities when making sense of this relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Research and Practice
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2026.2696280
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing a student’s covariational reasoning in constructing the diameter-circumference relationship

Esra Bukova Güzel, Aytuğ Özaltun Çelik
Learning Research and Practice
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Tracing a student’s covariational reasoning in constructing the diameter-circumference relationship

Esra Bukova Güzel, Aytuğ Özaltun Çelik
article en

Abstract

This study examines how a seventh-grade student coordinated circumference and diameter while constructing the relationship between these quantities. Conducted in two phases, a clinical interview and a task-based interview, the study drew on the student’s verbal responses, actions, and gestures. Clinical interview data were analysed descriptively, and task-based interview data through retrospective analysis. Findings showed that, although the student could carry out procedures involving circumference, he could not explain the reasoning underlying the formula π × d. During the task, he initially considered circumference and diameter separately, but later coordinated their corresponding changes. We recommend tasks that engage students in coordinating diameter and circumference as related quantities when making sense of this relationship.

Learning Research and Practice
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.