A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) embed research into clinical care. This deliberate research-care integration means that healthcare institutions are key partners for PCTs. Prior literature has identified several ethical challenges in PCTs for which institutional involvement is a necessary condition for their resolution. However, no comprehensive account exists to describe the moral obligations of healthcare institutions for PCTs. To that end, we propose a framework of ten obligations for institutions when leading or participating in PCTs. These obligations span the lifecycle of research, beginning with decisions about whether to implement a given study within a particular institution through to decisions about (de)implementation following study completion. For each obligation, we describe both the relevant moral considerations and the corresponding practical implications. While we offer several practical suggestions that can inform current research activities, future work will be needed to further specify these obligations to provide more granular guidance for decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2026.2691940
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Stephanie R. Morain, Jonathan D. Casey, Matthew W. Semler
The American Journal of Bioethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials

Stephanie R. Morain, Jonathan D. Casey, Matthew W. Semler
article en

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) embed research into clinical care. This deliberate research-care integration means that healthcare institutions are key partners for PCTs. Prior literature has identified several ethical challenges in PCTs for which institutional involvement is a necessary condition for their resolution. However, no comprehensive account exists to describe the moral obligations of healthcare institutions for PCTs. To that end, we propose a framework of ten obligations for institutions when leading or participating in PCTs. These obligations span the lifecycle of research, beginning with decisions about whether to implement a given study within a particular institution through to decisions about (de)implementation following study completion. For each obligation, we describe both the relevant moral considerations and the corresponding practical implications. While we offer several practical suggestions that can inform current research activities, future work will be needed to further specify these obligations to provide more granular guidance for decision-making.

The American Journal of Bioethics
Johns Hopkins University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Greenwall Foundation, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.